UN R133 Supplement 1 (00 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 133 (ECE R133) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their reusability, recyclability and recoverability.
UN R133 — Supplement 1 to the 00 series of amendments
Base text → Supplement 1
- What changed
- The introduction in paragraph 1. of Annex 6 is deleted.
- The list of component parts in paragraph 2. of Annex 6 is renumbered as paragraph 1.
- Why
- The proposal was to reproduce subparagraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph 7.1. correctly into Annex 6 or to delete the introduction totally. The final decision was to delete the introduction totally.
- It is then not possible to interpret paragraph 1. of Annex 6 in a different way from paragraph 7.1. of the core text.
Q1What changed3 changes
Annex 6 introduction deleted; paragraph 2. renumbered as paragraph 1.
The introduction in paragraph 1. of Annex 6 is deleted. The deleted text addressed the component parts of vehicles of categories M1 and N1 which must not be reused in the construction of new vehicles. The list of component parts in paragraph 2. is renumbered as paragraph 1.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Expert from the Russian Federation
- Working party
- GRPE, 83rd session (June 2021)
Reasons
The representative from the Russian Federation introduced the proposal to clarify provisions in UN Regulation No. 133.
Source
“The representative from the Russian Federation introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2021/16 to clarify provisions in UN Regulation No. 133.”
Paragraph 7.1. of the core text of UN Regulation No. 133 refers to Annex 6. The proposal was to reproduce subparagraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph 7.1. correctly into Annex 6 or to delete the introduction totally. The final decision was to delete the introduction totally.
Sources (3)
“Paragraph 7.1. of the core text of UN Regulation No. 133 contains the reference to Annex 6.”
“The proposal is to reproduce subparagraphs (a) and (b) of that paragraph 7.1. correctly into Annex 6 or to delete the introduction part totally.”
“The final decision is to delete the introduction totally.”
The representative from the Netherlands proposed an alternative wording, as reflected in Annex XI of the GRPE report, to simplify the proposal.
Source
“The representative from the Netherlands proposed an alternative wording to simplify the proposal, as reflected in Annex XI.”
It is then not possible to interpret paragraph 1. of Annex 6 in a different way from paragraph 7.1. of the core text.
Source
“Thus, it becomes not possible to interpret paragraph 1. of Annex 6 in a different way from the interpretation of paragraph 7.1. of the core text of UN Regulation No. 133.”
Document trail
- 2021-03ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2021/16Proposal by the expert from the Russian Federation
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/83GRPE session report, para. 31 and Annex XI
- 2021-09Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2021/135Text that GRPE sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2021-11WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1161Adopted at the 185th session (session report, para. 121)
- 2022-06-22In forceC.N.240.2022.TREATIES-XI.B.16.133UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- No direct action for this role.
Component supplier
- No direct action for this role.
Technical service / Approval authority
- No direct action for this role.
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.