UN R154 Base text (02 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 154 (ECE R154) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP).
UN R154 — 02 series of amendments
Changes from 00 series of amendments (supplement 1)
- What changed
- Table 1B now sets a particle number (PN) limit for Level 1B vehicles.
- The text no longer says “if PN measurement is required”, and the PN calibration rules change.
- Paragraph 8.2.3.1. now adds the OBFCM device accuracy to the verifications that follow Appendix 1.
- Why
- The new series adds particle number requirements and limits for Level 1B.
- The particulate measurement procedures follow UN GTR No. 15, Amendment 6.
- Before the vote, GRPE added a correction of the recursive formula for the CoP pass/fail criteria.
Q1What changed783 changes
Particle number limit for Level 1B and new series provisions (paras. 6.3.10., 6.7.2., 11. and 12.)
Table 1B now has a particle number (PN) limit, L6, for Level 1B. The scope for Level 1B now includes particle number. The text no longer says “if PN measurement is required” for PN sampling and measurement. Table 3b gives new assigned deterioration factors with a PN column, and an equation for other limit values. Unless the transitional provisions give an exemption, Contracting Parties must accept previous-version approvals for eight months after the 02 series enters into force.
PN measurement equipment and calibration (Annex B5, paras. 4.3. and 5.7.)
Calibration of the PNC must now follow ISO 27891:2015. The calibration factor must be between 0.9 and 1.1. New paragraph 4.3.1.3.3.1. gives an equation for the solid particle penetration. The instrument manufacturer must prove this penetration for each PN-system model. The text deletes the requirement for a coincidence correction function of up to 10 per cent. The evaporation tube can now be catalytically active, with a wall temperature of 350 °C (±10 °C).
Definitions, families and other requirements (paras. 3. to 7.)
New paragraph 3.2.37. defines “reference mass”. The “coasting” definition in paragraph 3.2.36. now says that no propulsion energy, recuperation energy or friction braking applies. Paragraph 5.11. now applies to Level 1A only, and paragraph 5.11.1. adds category N2. New paragraph 6.1.10. requires good engineering judgement when the data input to a formula justifiably leads to division by zero. Paragraph 6.3.11. no longer applies to Level 1A only, and the road load family no longer uses n/v ratios. Table 4B for Level 1B no longer includes category N2.
Conformity of production and the OBFCM device (para. 8. and Appendices 1 to 4 and 6)
Paragraph 8.2.3.1. now adds the OBFCM device accuracy to the verifications that follow Appendix 1. Appendix 2 evaluates the OBFCM devices with paragraph 3.3.1. and a factor A value of 1.0526. If a fail decision for OBFCM accuracy comes from tests with commercial fuel, the tests must be done again with reference fuel. For the Type 4 CoP test, paragraph 8.3. now allows the Type 4 test of Annex C3 or the tests of Appendix 4. Appendix 2 has new recursive formulae for the test statistic. On manufacturer request and authority approval, the run-in factor for pollutant emissions, fuel efficiency and fuel consumption can apply to other CoP families.
Test procedures in Annexes B1 to B7 and C3 to C5
At the request of the manufacturer, a NOVC-HEV can use the Annex B1 downscaling with the maximum rated engine power. This needs approval of the responsible authority, and the electric machine must not affect the maximum vehicle power. Annex B4 now models the aerodynamic drag coefficient as a five-term polynomial, not a four-term polynomial. Annex B6 adds the measurement of the alternator or DC/DC converter current and the recording of OBFCM data. In Annex B7, vehicles with a manual transmission can exclude upward gear shifts, for a maximum of 2 seconds, from the drive trace indices calculation. Annex C5 now tests OVC-HEVs under charge-sustaining conditions, deletes a reference to ISO 14229:2013 and adds SAE J 1979-2.
Calculations for electrified vehicles (Annex B8 and its appendices)
For OVC-HEVs and NOVC-HEVs, particle number is now analysed for each test phase. For phases where no combustion engine operates, the emission results can be set to zero. Paragraph 3.1.1.6. keeps the analysis of particulate matter for each applicable test cycle and now allows zero results for cycles without combustion engine operation. For OVC-FCHVs, the considered phase j is the applicable WLTP test cycle only. The EAER equation now uses the arithmetic average charge-sustaining CO2 emission from Table A8/5, step No. 6. Appendix 8 now determines reference values of electric energy consumption for CoP, for PEVs and for OVC-HEVs.
Information document, test reports and wording (Annexes A1 to A3 and the whole text)
The information document in Annex A1 adds an entry for the KCO2 correction factor family. The test report asks which level is requested, Level 1A or Level 1B. Insulation volume and insulation weight now have a tolerance of +/- 10 per cent. In many paragraphs, “CO2 mass emission” becomes “CO2 emission”. Some changes are wording only, for example “power train” becomes “powertrain” and “[Reserved]” becomes “(Reserved)”. Some footnotes have new links to UNECE web pages.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Experts from the European Commission, Japan and OICA
- Working party
- GRPE, 84th session (November 2021) and 85th session (January 2022)
Reasons
The proposal adds particle number requirements and limits for Level 1B. For this reason, a new series of amendments is necessary.
Source
“A new series of amendments is required because this proposed amendment introduces particle number requirements and limits for Level 1B.”
The particulate measurement procedures follow the changes in UN GTR No. 15, Amendment 6.
Source
“The proposal also aligns the particulate measurement procedures with changes introduced in GTR No 15 Amendment 6 and other adaptations to technical progress.”
OICA proposed to correct the recursive formula for the CoP pass/fail criteria in the 02 and 03 series of UN Regulation No. 154.
Source
“proposing to correct the recursive formula calculating pass/fail criteria of CoP in the 05, 06, 07 Series of Amendments to UN Regulation No. 83 and the 02 and 03 Series of Amendments to UN Regulation No. 154”
Document trail
- 2021-09ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2021/21Proposal by the European Commission, Japan and OICA
- 2021-11RevisedGRPE-84-06Changes to the proposal for the 84th GRPE session
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/84Session report, para. 16
- 2022-01Amended in sessionGRPE-85-15OICA correction of the recursive formula for Vn in Appendix 2
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/85Session report, para. 12
- 2022-01Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2022/41/Rev.1Text that GRPE sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2022-03WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1164Adopted at the 186th session (session report, para. 132)
- 2022-10-08In forceC.N.365.2022.TREATIES-XI.B.16.154UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- Measure particle number for Level 1B approvals and compare the results with the PN limit in Table 1B.
- Use the new assigned deterioration factors of Table 3b, or the new equation for other limit values.
- Make sure that the OBFCM device meets the CoP accuracy check of Appendix 2 with factor A of 1.0526.
- Update the information document and test report: add the KCO2 correction factor family and the requested level.
Component supplier
- If you make PN measurement systems, prove the solid particle penetration for each PN-system model.
- If you make PN measurement systems, give the maintenance or replacement interval for the VPR.
Technical service / Approval authority
- Calibrate the PNC according to ISO 27891:2015 and use a calibration factor between 0.9 and 1.1.
- Repeat a failed OBFCM accuracy test with reference fuel if the first tests used commercial fuel.
- Update your CoP procedures for the Type 4 test: use Annex C3 or, as an alternative, Appendix 4.
- As the approval authority, keep a record of the OBFCM device accuracy at each test and of each decision.
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.