UN R163 Supplement 2 (00 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 163 (ECE R163) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicle alarm system and approval of a vehicle with regard to its vehicle alarm system.
UN R163 — Supplement 2 to the 00 series of amendments
Supplement 1 → 2
- What changed
- Paragraph 1.1. now covers approval of Vehicle Alarm Systems (VAS) which are intended to be permanently fitted to vehicles of any category.
- Components that are not embedded in the vehicle, for example keys, are not required to be submitted to the tests listed under paragraph 7.2.
- Paragraphs 14.1. to 14.3. on modification of the type and extension of approval are replaced with new text.
- Why
- The proposal was made to clarify the scope of the UN Regulation.
- The proposal was also made to complement the text with the missing Supplement 7 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 116.
- The new wording of paragraphs 14.1. to 14.3. is copied from the wording adopted for paragraph 7. in UN Regulation No. 160. It is aligned with Schedule 3 of the 58 Agreement.
Q1What changed26 changes
What the Regulation applies to (paras 1.1. to 1.4.)
Paragraph 1.1. now covers approval of Vehicle Alarm Systems (VAS) which are intended to be permanently fitted to vehicles of any category. Paragraph 1.2. covers approval of vehicles of category M1 and those of category N1 with a maximum mass of not more than 2 tonnes. This approval is with regard to their alarm system(s). An earlier item on “If fitted” vehicle alarm systems primarily dedicated to these vehicles is deleted. Under paragraph 1.3., at the request of the manufacturer, Contracting Parties may grant approvals to vehicles of other categories with regard to their alarm system(s). Before, this paragraph also named approvals to Vehicle Alarm Systems for fitment to such vehicles.
Lamps and components not embedded in the vehicle (para. 7)
Paragraph 7 now has a rule for lamps used as part of the optical warning devices and included in the standard car lighting system. These lamps need not comply with the operation parameters in paragraph 7.1. and must not be submitted to the tests listed under paragraph 7.2. Components that are not embedded in the vehicle, for example keys used for activation/deactivation of VAS, need not comply with paragraph 7.1. operation parameters. These components are not required to be submitted to the tests listed under paragraph 7.2.
Modification of the type (paras 14., 14.1., 14.1.1. and 14.1.2.)
Every modification of a vehicle or component type with regard to this UN Regulation must be notified to the approving type approval authority (TAA). Paragraph 14.1.1. lets the TAA consider that the modifications are unlikely to have an appreciable adverse effect and that the component or vehicle still complies. Or, under paragraph 14.1.2., the TAA may require a further report from the technical service responsible for conducting the tests. Before, the Type Approval Authority had to either decide, in consultation with the manufacturer, that a new type approval is to be granted. Or it had to apply the revision procedure and, if applicable, the extension procedure. The earlier text of paragraphs 14.1.1. on a “revision” and 14.1.2. on an “extension” is deleted.
Confirmation, refusal and extension of approval (paras 14.2. and 14.3.)
Paragraph 14.2. still says that confirmation or refusal of approval must be communicated by the procedure specified in paragraph 4.3. A deleted text required the index to the information documents and test reports to show the date of the most recent revision or extension. Under paragraph 14.3., the TAA issuing the extension of approval must inform the other Contracting Parties of the extension by means of the communication form. It must assign a serial number to each communication form drawn up for such an extension. Before, paragraph 14.3. required the Type Approval Authority to assign a serial number to each communication form drawn up for such an extension.
Vehicle alarm system instead of immobilizer (Annex 1a, para. 3.1.1.; Annex 2b, para. 4.2.4.)
In Annex 1a, paragraph 3.1.1., and Annex 2b, paragraph 4.2.4., the text now says “vehicle alarm system” instead of “immobilizer”. Annex 1a, paragraph 3.1.1. asks for a detailed description of the vehicle type with regard to the arrangement of the installed vehicle alarm system. Annex 2b, paragraph 4.2.4. now asks for the types of vehicles on which the vehicle alarm system has been tested.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Expert from the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers
- Working party
- GRSG, 123rd session (March–April 2022)
Reasons
For paragraph 1., the split of UN Regulation No. 116 is, among others, the opportunity to clarify the scope of the regulations. The new structure clarifies which vehicle categories are in or out of the scope, and which sections of the regulation apply to which vehicle/systems.
Sources (2)
“The split of UN Regulation No. 116 is among others the opportunity to clarify the scope of the regulations.”
“This structure well clarifies which vehicle categories are in or out of the scope, and which sections of the regulation apply to which vehicle/systems.”
For paragraph 7, the added text is the content regarding a vehicle alarm system of UN Regulation No. 116 Supplement 7. It was lost during the split into new UN Regulations, so it needs to be added again.
Sources (2)
“The added text is the content regarding a vehicle alarm system of UN Regulation No. 116 Supplement 7 and was lost during the split into new UN Regulations.”
“Therefore, it needs to be added again.”
For paragraphs 14.1. to 14.3., alignment to paragraph 9 was lost during the split of UN Regulation No. 116. A new text was created. The new wording is copied from the wording adopted for paragraph 7. in UN Regulation No. 160. It is aligned with Schedule 3 of the 58 Agreement.
Sources (2)
“During the split of UN Regulation No. 116, alignment to paragraph 9 was lost and a new text was created.”
“The new wording is copied from the wording adopted for paragraph 7. in UN Regulation No. 160 (MOIS – document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/122) and is aligned with Schedule 3 of the 58 Agreement.”
For Annex 1a, paragraph 3.1.1. and Annex 2b, paragraph 4.2.4., the proposal speaks of copy/paste errors. Some references to immobilizers should turn to references to VAS.
Source
“Annex 1a, paragraph 3.1.1. and Annex 2b, paragraph 4.2.4. Copy/paste errors: some references to immobilizers should turn to references to VAS.”
Document trail
- —ProposalGRSG-122-11OICA proposal distributed at the 122nd session of GRSG
- 2022-01ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/16Proposal by the expert from OICA, based on GRSG-122-11
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/102GRSG session report, para. 48: adopted, not amended
- 2022-08Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2022/127Text that GRSG sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2022-11WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1168Adopted at the 188th session (session report, para. 138)
- 2023-06-05In forceC.N.187.2023.TREATIES-XI.B.16.163UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- Do not submit standard car lighting system lamps used as part of the optical warning devices to paragraph 7.2. tests.
Component supplier
- Update VAS test plans: components not embedded in the vehicle, for example keys, need not undergo paragraph 7.2. tests.
Technical service / Approval authority
- Do not require paragraph 7.2. tests for components not embedded in the vehicle, for example keys.
- If you conducted the tests, be ready to give a further report when the TAA requires one (para. 14.1.2.).
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.