RegVault

UN R131 Base text (02 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 131 (ECE R131) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M2, M3, N2 and N3 vehicles.

UN R131 — 02 series of amendments

Changes from 01 series of amendments (supplement 2)

Adopted at the WP.29 187th sessionEntry into force 2023-01-04
What changed
  • Paragraph 5.2.2. now covers a vehicle to pedestrian scenario, with requirements for collision warning, emergency braking, speed range and speed reduction.
  • Under paragraph 5.4.1.4., for every manual deactivation requested by the driver, the AEBS must be automatically reinstated latest after 15 minutes.
  • As from 1 September 2025, Contracting Parties are not obliged to accept type approvals to the preceding series first issued after 1 September 2025.
Why
  • The proposal was to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art.
  • This version extends the scope to new scenarios like city driving.
  • Active safety systems in general have made a giant leap over the 2010s in avoiding or mitigating accidents.

Q1What changed525 changes

Title, scope and definitions (paras 1. and 2.1. to 2.17.)

The title now ends with “for M2, M3, N2 and N3 vehicles”. Paragraph 1 now also covers a system to avoid or mitigate the severity of an impact with a pedestrian. Paragraph 1 adds a rule for category M2, and for category M3/N2 with a maximum weight below or equal to 8t, equipped with hydraulic braking. For these vehicles, Contracting Parties that are signatories to both UN Regulation No. 152 and this Regulation must recognize approvals to either as equally valid. New definitions include “Vehicle Target”, “Pedestrian Target”, “Initialisation”, “Mass of a vehicle in running order”, “Maximum mass” and “Dry road affording good adhesion”. The definitions of “Target”, “Moving target” and “Stationary target” are deleted.

Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking Systems System (AEBS) for M2, M3, N2 and N3 vehicles
As defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.2ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.6, para. 2. - https://unece.org/transport/standards/transport/vehicle-regulations-wp29/resolutions
56 more changes in this group — open in Compare

General requirements, warnings and false reaction avoidance (paras 5.1. to 5.1.8.)

Under paragraph 5.1.1., every vehicle with an AEBS, when activated and operated within the prescribed speed ranges, must meet paragraphs 5.1. and 5.3. to 5.6. Paragraph 5.2.1. applies to vehicles submitted to approval for the vehicle to vehicle scenario, and paragraph 5.2.2. to those for the vehicle to pedestrian scenario. Upon detection of any non-electrical failure condition, for example sensor blindness or sensor misalignment, the failure warning signal must be illuminated. If the system has not been initialised after a cumulative driving time of 15 seconds above 10 km/h, the driver must be informed of this. False reaction avoidance must now be shown in the Annex 3 assessment, which must include in particular the scenarios in Appendix 2 of Annex 3. Paragraph 5.1.2. now refers to the 05 or later series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 10, instead of the 03 and 04 series.

General requirements
Any vehicle fitted with an AEBS complying with the definition of paragraph 2.1. above shall , when activated and operated within the prescribed speed ranges, meet the performance requirements contained in paragraphs 5.1. to 5.6.2. of this Regulation and shall be equipped with an anti-lock braking function in accordance with the performance requirements of Annex 13 to Regulation No. 13.:
26 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to pedestrian scenarios (paras 5.2. to 5.2.2.4.)

Paragraph 5.2.1. now covers the vehicle to vehicle scenario, and paragraph 5.2.2. covers the vehicle to pedestrian scenario. Under paragraphs 5.2.1.2. and 5.2.2.2., a detected possible imminent collision must cause a braking demand of at least 4 m/s² to the service braking system. In paragraph 5.2.1.3., the lower limit of the speed range is now 10 km/h instead of 15 km/h. Under paragraph 5.2.2.3., the system must be active at least between 20 km/h and 60 km/h and at all vehicle load conditions, unless deactivated. Paragraphs 5.2.1.4. and 5.2.2.4. give tables of maximum impact speeds for the case without driver’s input that would lead to interruption under paragraph 5.3.2. The AEBS must meet these values provided the listed conditions are met; when conditions deviate, it must not deactivate or unreasonably switch the control strategy.

With the exception of vehicles with hydraulic braking which are not derived from M1/N1, since the minimum relative speed for collision avoidance is already lower than 40km/h.
Performance requirementsSpecific Requirements
79 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Interruption, deactivation, warning indication and periodic technical inspection (paras 5.3. to 5.6.2.)

The AEBS must now provide appropriate and robust means for the driver to interrupt the collision warning and the emergency braking. Paragraph 5.4.1.2. requires that manual deactivation is not possible with less than two deliberate actions. Under paragraph 5.4.1.4., for every manual deactivation requested by the driver, the AEBS must be automatically reinstated latest after 15 minutes. When the vehicle can automatically deactivate the AEBS, the manufacturer must give the technical service a list of situations and corresponding criteria at type approval. The collision warning referred to in paragraphs 5.2.1.1. and 5.2.2.1. must be provided by at least two modes selected from acoustic, haptic or optical. When an optical warning signal shows that the AEBS is temporarily not available, it must be constant; “and yellow in colour” is deleted.

Interruption by the driverDriver
The AEBS shall provide the appropriate and robust means for the driver to interrupt the collision warning and the emergency braking phase.
30 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Tests (paras 6.1. to 6.10.3.) and the deleted table of pass/fail values

Natural ambient illumination must be homogeneous in the test area, above 1000 lux for vehicle to vehicle and 2000 lux for vehicle to pedestrian. The test surface has a consistent slope between level and 1 per cent. Pedestrian detection tests must use a child “articulated soft target”, representative of human attributes for the AEBS sensor system according to ISO 19206-2:2018. Paragraph 6.6. now gives a warning and activation test with a pedestrian target. Under paragraph 6.9.1., failed test runs within one category must not exceed 10.0 per cent of the performed test runs. The table of pass/fail values for warning timing and speed reduction is deleted, together with paragraphs 6.4.2., 6.4.5., 6.5.2. and 6.5.4.

The identification characteristics of the soft target shall be agreed upon between the Technical Service and the vehicle manufacturer as being equivalent to a passenger car of category M1 AA saloon
The point of reference of each stationary vehicle for establishing the distance between the two stationary vehicles, shall be determined in accordance with ISO 612-1978.
116 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Approval, approval mark, communication form and transitional provisions

In paragraph 4.2., the first two digits of the approval number are now 02, corresponding to the 02 series of amendments. The Annex 1 communication form now has entries for approval to the vehicle to vehicle scenario and to the vehicle to pedestrian scenario. The approval mark description now says the mark uses C for Vehicle to Vehicle and P for Vehicle to Pedestrian. As from 1 September 2025, Contracting Parties are not obliged to accept type approvals to the preceding series first issued after 1 September 2025. Until 1 September 2028, Contracting Parties must accept type approvals to the preceding series of amendments first issued before 1 September 2025. As from 1 September 2028, Contracting Parties are not obliged to accept type approvals issued to the preceding series of amendments.

The distinguishing numbers of the Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement are reproduced in Annex 3 to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.2/Amend.3 - www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29resolutions.htmlECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.6, Annex 3 - https://unece.org/transport/standards/transport/vehicle-regulations-wp29/resolutions
Delete Strike out what does not apply.
51 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Annex 3: electronic control systems, model assessment form and false reaction scenarios

Paragraph 5.1.3. now refers to Annex 3 instead of Annex 4 for the safety aspects of electronic control systems. The annex heading now says “electronic control systems” instead of “complex electronic vehicle control systems”. The Technical Service must assess the documentation package and the application of the analytical approaches. Reporting of the assessment by the Technical Service must allow traceability. New Appendix 1 gives a model assessment form for electronic systems. New Appendix 2 gives four false reaction scenarios, and the manufacturer must provide evidence of the system’s behaviour in them.

To be signed by different persons even when the Technical Service and Type Approval Authority are the same or alternatively, a separate Type Approval Authority authorization is issued with the report.
Until proper values heavy vehicles are defined, the values for each scenario may be changed in agreement between the technical service and the manufacturer. It is recognized that the parameters described in subparagraph 2 of each scenario are based on passenger cars data
153 more changes in this group — open in Compare
See every change side by side in Compare

Q2Why it changed

Proposed by
Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking System for heavy vehicles
Working party
GRVA, 12th session (January 2022)

Reasons

  • The proposal was to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art.

    Source
    “proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art”
  • The Regulation was originally intended for AEBS on M2, M3, N2 and N3 vehicles primarily used under monotonous highway driving conditions. This version extends the scope to new scenarios like city driving.

    Sources (2)
    “The original intention of this Regulation was to establish uniform provisions for Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) fitted to motor vehicles of the Categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 primarily used under monotonous highway driving conditions.”
    “This version extends the scope to new scenarios like city driving.”

Document trail

  1. 2021-11ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7Proposal in a consolidated form
  2. —RevisedGRVA-12-08Amendments to the proposal
  3. —Amended in sessionGRVA-12-49Document amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7
  4. —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/12Session report, para. 72
  5. 2022-04Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2022/76Text that GRVA sent to WP.29 and AC.1
  6. 2022-06WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1166Adopted at the 187th session (session report, para. 182)
  7. 2023-01-04In forceC.N.494.2022.TREATIES-XI.B.16.131UN depositary notification

Q3Who is affected

Vehicle manufacturer

  • Test the AEBS against the maximum impact speed tables and conditions of paragraphs 5.2.1.4. and 5.2.2.4.
  • Make sure that manual deactivation of the AEBS is not possible with less than two deliberate actions (paragraph 5.4.1.2.).
  • For every manual deactivation requested by the driver, make sure the AEBS is automatically reinstated latest after 15 minutes.
  • If the vehicle can automatically deactivate the AEBS, give the technical service the list of situations and criteria (paragraph 5.4.2.1.).
  • Give evidence of the system’s behaviour in the false reaction scenarios of Appendix 2 of Annex 3.

Component supplier

  • Make sure that the failure warning signal is illuminated upon detection of any non-electrical failure condition (paragraph 5.1.4.1.2.).
  • Inform the driver if the system is not initialised after a cumulative driving time of 15 seconds above 10 km/h.
  • Keep the AEBS active at least between 20 km/h and 60 km/h, unless deactivated (paragraph 5.2.2.3.).

Technical service / Approval authority

  • Test pedestrian detection with a child articulated soft target according to ISO 19206-2:2018 (paragraphs 6.3.2. and 6.6.).
  • Check that failed test runs within one category do not exceed 10.0 per cent of the performed test runs.
  • Assess the documentation package and the application of the analytical approaches under Annex 3.
  • Report the Annex 3 assessment in a manner that allows traceability.

See every change side by side

RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.

ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.

More UN R131 change reports

All UN R131 change reports