RegVault

UN R154 Supplement 1 (02 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 154 (ECE R154) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP).

UN R154 — Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments

Base text → Supplement 1

Adopted at the WP.29 191st sessionEntry into force 2024-06-15
What changed
  • New paragraph 12.3. sets dates for Level 1A OVC-HEVs and OVC-FCHVs to move to the normalised distances dneb and dnec.
  • Type 1 test CoP verification now takes criteria emissions and CO2 results from step 5, and new Table App1/1 gives the final CoP procedure.
  • For Level 1A, the EAER equations now use averages over all individual charge-depleting tests.
Why
  • The proposers say that the supplement aligns the Regulation with the latest regional requirements.
  • The proposal also clarifies provisions that may lead to multiple interpretations and corrects errors.

Q1What changed349 changes

Utility factors and transitional provisions (para. 12.3. and Annex B8, Appendix 5)

Appendix 5 to Annex B8 now gives three normalised distances for the utility factor equation: dnea, dneb (2200 km) and dnec (4260 km). Paragraph 2. now applies this equation to OVC-HEVs and OVC-FCHVs of category M1 or N1 with emission characters EA, EB or EC. Paragraph 1. is now “Reserved”; before, it let each Contracting Party develop its own UFs. New paragraph 12.3. applies to Level 1A type approvals for OVC-HEVs and OVC-FCHVs. From 1 January 2025, new types get approvals only with UF-weighted values based on dneb, and from 1 January 2027 only with dnec. Contracting Parties need not accept approvals based on dnea from 1 January 2026, or on dneb from 1 January 2028.

Each Contracting Party may develop its own UFs.Reserved
The methodology recommended for the determination of a UF curve based on driving statistics is described in SAE J2841 (Sept. 2010, Issued 2009-03, Revised 2010-09).For the approval of OVC-HEVs or OVC-FCHVs of category M1 or N1 with emission characters EA, EB or EC as referred to in Table A3/1 of Annex 3 to the 08 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 83, the fractional utility factor UFj for the weighting of period j, shall be calculated in accordance with the following equation:
12 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Road load, reference fuels and test equipment (Annexes B3, B4 and B5)

At the option of the manufacturer, coastdowns may now be performed between 1 °C and 40 °C, instead of between 1 °C and 5 °C. In Table A4/2, the RRC ranges of the energy efficiency classes for C1, C2 and C3 tyres change. At the request of the manufacturer, bd and cd can now be set to zero during the coastdown and for calculating fjDyno. Before, this was only for cd. New paragraph 4.4.5. requires that the equations of motion are corrected to reference conditions as specified in paragraph 4.5. Annex B3 now refers to JIS K2258-1,2 and to EN ISO 3015 instead of EN 116.

JIS K2258 K2258-1,2 a
EN 116EN ISO 3015
27 more changes in this group — open in Compare

CO2 interpolation steps for Level 1A and Level 1B (Annexes B6, B7 and B8)

Text that took CO2 values from step 9 of Table A7/1 or step 8 of Table A8/5 now refers to new tables by level. For Level 1B, these tables use step 6 of Table A7/1 or Table A8/5 for tested vehicles and for vehicles H and L. New text in Annexes B7 and B8 calculates the CO2 emission of an individual vehicle for Level 1B. This calculation is only for the extrapolation criterion in paragraph 2.3.2.3. of Annex B6 or paragraph 4.5.1.1.4. of Annex B8. In the calculation table of Annex B7, the text that applied the run-in factor for conformity of production is deleted.

The interpolation method shall only be used if the difference in CO2 over the applicable cycle resulting from step 9 in Table A7/1 of Annex B7 the table below between test vehicles L and H is between a minimum of 5 g/km and a maximum defined in paragraph 2.3.2.2. of this annex.
The maximum difference in CO2 emissions allowed over the applicable cycle resulting from step 9 in Table A7/1 of Annex B7 the table below between test vehicles L and H shall be 20 per cent plus 5 g/km of the CO2 emissions from vehicle H, but at least 15 g/km and not exceeding 30 g/km. See Figure A6/2.
48 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Equivalent all-electric range of OVC-HEVs (Annexes B6 and B8)

Paragraph 1.2.3.3. of Annex B6 now says that the declared EAER of OVC-HEVs must not be determined according to Figure A6/1. The declared value is the type approval value if it is less than the calculated EAER. If not, the calculated EAER is the type approval value. In Annex B8, the equation for the phase-specific EAER now has separate text for Level 1A and Level 1B. For Level 1A, the cycle-specific and phase-specific EAER equations use arithmetic averages calculated for all individual charge-depleting tests. The text deletes paragraph 4.5.8., which let the manufacturer decrease the individual EAER value.

Calculated value EAER Declared value - - - - -
Measured value* Final EAER values
78 more changes in this group — open in Compare

REESS correction and REESS voltage (appendices to Annexes B6 and B8)

In the REESS energy change-based correction procedure of Annex B8, paragraph 3.1.2.1. or 3.2.2.1. must be omitted when consecutive sequences are conducted. For REESS voltage in Annex B8, the manufacturer may use the vehicle on-board REESS voltage measurement data instead of the external measurement in paragraph 3.1. The accuracy of these data must be demonstrated to the responsible authority. The nominal voltage of the REESS must be determined according to IEC 60050-482.

{\{\mathrm{\Delta}E}_{REESS,j,i} = {\\frac{1}{3600} \times U}_{REESSU_{REESS} \times \int_{t_{0}}^{t_{end}}{I(t)}_{j,i}dt
the manufacturer can prove to the responsible authority by measurement that there is no relation between ∆EREESS and CO2 mass emission and between ∆EREESS and fuel consumption respectively.
17 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Conformity of production and run-in factors (paragraph 8.)

For Type 1 test CoP verification, criteria emissions test results now come from step 5 of Table A7/1, Table A8/5 or Table A8/8. New Table App1/1 shows the procedure for calculating the final CoP test results. The test cycle of the tested vehicle must match the cycle used for its cycle energy demand in cycle class, downscaling and capped speed. In the run-in test procedure, the run-in factor extension to other CoP families now covers CO2, pollutant emissions, fuel efficiency and electric energy consumption. The slope CRI should now be corrected downward with the standard errors of the slope.

Verifying Verification of CoP on the criteria emissions for pure ICE vehicles, NOVC-HEVs and OVC-HEVs
1.1.
114 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Approval documents, Type 4 test and OBD (Annexes Part A, C3 and C5)

The documentation in Annexes Part A no longer refers to the series of amendments which includes Level 2. The addendum to the type approval communication now refers to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 154. Paragraph 4.2. no longer asks to include the item 3.2.12.2.7.6. information of Annex A1 in Appendix 1 to the communication. In Annex C5, paragraph 3.2.1.2. now refers to engine coolant temperatures instead of engine temperatures. Engine coolant temperature is only deemed subject to approval if it is used as a substitute to ambient temperature.

Vehicle M description (if APPlicableapplicable)
U-weighted UF-weighted pollutant emissions of OVC-HEVs
39 more changes in this group — open in Compare
See every change side by side in Compare

Q2Why it changed

Proposed by
European Commission, Japan and the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers
Working party
GRPE, 89th session (May–June 2023)

Reasons

  • The supplement is necessary to align the Regulation with the latest regional requirements.

    Source
    “This supplement is required in order to align the Regulation with the latest regional requirements.”
  • The proposal also clarifies provisions that may lead to multiple interpretations, and it corrects errors.

    Source
    “The proposal also clarifies the provisions which may lead to multiple interpretations and corrects errors.”

Document trail

  1. 2023-03ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2023/16Consolidated proposal for Supplement 1 to the 02 series
  2. —RevisedGRPE-89-16-Rev.1Revised proposal introduced by Japan after side meetings
  3. —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/89Adoption by GRPE, para. 25
  4. 2023-09Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2023/127Text that GRPE sent to WP.29 and AC.1
  5. 2023-11WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1175Adopted at the 191st session (session report, para. 180)
  6. 2024-06-15In forceC.N.267.2024.TREATIES-XI.B.16.154UN depositary notification

Q3Who is affected

Vehicle manufacturer

  • For new Level 1A OVC-HEV and OVC-FCHV types, base UF-weighted approval values on dneb from 1 January 2025.
  • For new Level 1A OVC-HEV and OVC-FCHV types, base UF-weighted approval values on dnec from 1 January 2027.
  • Do not use Figure A6/1 to determine the declared EAER of OVC-HEVs.

Component supplier

  • No direct action for this role.

Technical service / Approval authority

  • Calculate the final CoP test results with Table App1/1 of Appendix 1.
  • For CoP tests, use the cycle class, downscaling and capped speed used for the cycle energy demand of the vehicle.
  • Correct the equations of motion to reference conditions as specified in paragraph 4.5.

See every change side by side

RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.

ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.

More UN R154 change reports

All UN R154 change reports