RegVault

UN R135 Base text (02 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 135 (ECE R135) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their Pole Side Impact performance (PSI).

UN R135 — 02 series of amendments

Changes from 01 series of amendments (supplement 3)

Adopted at the WP.29 187th sessionEntry into force 2023-01-04
What changed
  • New paragraph 5.6. covers protection against electrical shock, electrolyte spillage, REESS retention and REESS fire hazards after the Annex 3 test.
  • New Annex 11 describes test procedures to demonstrate compliance with the electrical safety requirements of paragraph 5.6.
  • From 1 September 2023, Contracting Parties are not obliged to accept type-approvals of vehicles to the preceding series first issued after that date.
Why
  • The technical provisions on post-crash electrical safety in UN GTR No. 20 are adopted for UN Regulation No. 135.
  • The proposal aims to introduce requirements concerning post-crash electrical safety in the event of a pole side impact collision.
  • The administrative provisions are adapted to revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.

Q1What changed271 changes

Electric power train requirements and protection against electrical shock (paras. 5.2. and 5.6. to 5.6.1.4.2.)

Paragraph 5.2. now adds that vehicles equipped with electric power train must meet the requirements of paragraph 5.6. After the impact, the high voltage buses must meet at least one of the four criteria of paragraphs 5.6.1.1. to 5.6.1.4.2. The absence of high voltage criterion limits Ub, U1 and U2 to 30 VAC or 60 VDC within 60 seconds after the impact. Under the low electrical energy criterion, the Total Energy (TE) on the high voltage buses must be less than 0.2 joules. Physical protection requires protection degree IPXXB against direct contact with high voltage live parts. The criterion of paragraph 5.6.1.4. does not apply if more than a single potential of a part of the high voltage bus lacks IPXXB protection.

Additionally, vehicles equipped with electric power train shall meet the requirements of paragraph 5.6. This can be met by a separate impact test at the request of the manufacturer and after validation by the Technical Service, provided that the electrical components do not influence the occupant protection performance of the vehicle type as defined in paragraphs 5.3. to 5.5. of this Regulation. In case of this condition the requirements of paragraph 5.6. shall be checked in accordance with the methods set out in Annex 3 to this Regulation, except paragraphs 8. of Annex 3.
Following the test conducted in accordance with the procedure defined in Annex 3 to this Regulation, the electric power train operating on high voltage and the high voltage systems which are galvanically connected to the high voltage bus of the electric power train shall meet the following requirements:
25 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Electrolyte spillage, REESS retention and REESS fire hazards (paras. 5.6.2. to 5.6.4.)

For an aqueous electrolyte REESS, no electrolyte may leak into the passenger compartment from the impact until 60 minutes after the impact. In that period, at most 7 per cent by volume of its electrolyte, with a maximum of 5.0 l, may leak outside the passenger compartment. A non-aqueous electrolyte REESS must not leak liquid electrolyte into the passenger or luggage compartment or outside the vehicle within 60 minutes of the impact. The REESS must remain attached to the vehicle by at least one component anchorage, bracket, or structure that transfers loads to the vehicle structure. A REESS located outside the passenger compartment must not enter the passenger compartment. From the impact until 60 minutes after the impact, there must be no evidence of fire or explosion from the REESS.

Electrolyte spillage
In case of aqueous electrolyte REESS.
7 more changes in this group — open in Compare

New and changed definitions (paras. 2.14. to 2.56.)

Paragraph 2.14. now defines “Passenger compartment with regard to occupant protection”, instead of “Passenger compartment”. New paragraph 2.15. defines “Passenger compartment for electric safety assessment”. Former paragraphs 2.15. to 2.25. are renumbered as paragraphs 2.16. to 2.26., and former paragraphs 2.26. and 2.27. become paragraphs 2.27. and 2.28. The “Vehicle type” definition adds item (j), REESS locations, in so far as they have a negative effect on the impact test result. New paragraphs 2.29. to 2.56. add definitions, for example “High voltage”, “Electric power train”, “State of Charge (SOC)”, “Fire” and “Explosion”.

"Passenger compartment with regard to occupant protection" means the space for occupant accommodation, bounded by the roof, floor, side walls, doors, outside glazing and front bulkhead and the plane of the rear compartment bulkhead or the plane of the rear-seat back support.
2.15.2.16.
47 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Electrical power train adjustment (Annex 3, para. 7.) and renumbered paras. 8. to 9.6.

Annex 3 adds new paragraph 7. on electrical power train adjustment, with procedures for SOC adjustment. The adjustment of SOC must be conducted at an ambient temperature of 20 ± 10 °C. Where different charging procedures are possible, the REESS must be charged using the procedure which yields the highest SOC. When the vehicle is tested, a REESS designed to be externally charged must have no less than 95 per cent of this SOC. For a REESS designed to be charged only by an energy source on the vehicle, the minimum is 90 per cent. Former paragraphs 7. to 8.6. of Annex 3 are renumbered as paragraphs 8. to 9.6.

7.8.
7.1.8.1.
21 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Test procedures for electrical safety (new Annex 11)

New Annex 11 describes test procedures to demonstrate compliance with the electrical safety requirements of paragraph 5.6. Where its voltage instructions are used, the voltage must be measured not earlier than 10 seconds and not later than 60 seconds after the impact. Paragraph 3. gives the assessment procedure for low electrical energy, with formulas for the Total Energy (TE, TEy1, TEy2). For physical protection, the jointed test finger must be inserted into any gaps or openings with a test force of 10 N ± 10 per cent. Paragraph 4.1. gives two test methods for measuring electric resistance: a resistance tester, or a DC power supply, voltmeter and ammeter. Paragraph 5. gives two isolation resistance measurement methods: DC voltage from external sources, or the vehicle's own REESS as DC voltage source.

Figure 1 Measurement of Ub, U1, U2
Figure 2 E.g. measurement of high voltage bus energy stored in X-capacitors
104 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Transitional provisions for the 02 series (paras. 11.6. to 11.11.)

From the 02 series' official date of entry into force, no Contracting Party applying this Regulation may refuse to grant or accept its type-approvals. From 1 September 2023, Contracting Parties are not obliged to accept type-approvals of vehicles to the preceding series first issued after 1 September 2023. Approvals of vehicles to the preceding series first issued before 1 September 2023 must stay accepted if the earlier transitional provisions foresee this. Contracting Parties may grant type-approvals to any preceding series, and must continue to grant extensions of existing approvals to any preceding series. Contracting Parties starting to apply this Regulation after the most recent series enters into force are not obliged to accept approvals to any preceding series.

Contracting Parties applying this Regulation shall continue to grant extensions of existing approvals to any preceding series of amendments to this Regulation.
Notwithstanding the transitional provisions above, Contracting Parties who start to apply this Regulation after the date of entry into force of the most recent series of amendments are not obliged to accept type-approvals which were granted in accordance with any of the preceding series of amendments to this Regulation.
4 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Approval procedures, conformity of production, communication form and approval marks (paras. 3.2.6. to 9., Annexes 1 and 2)

New paragraph 3.2.6. adds a general description of the electrical power source type, location and the electric power train (for example hybrid, electric). Paragraph 4.3. now assigns approval numbers in accordance with Schedule 4 of the Agreement (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3 and Amend.1). After a modification is notified, the Type Approval Authority may decide, in consultation with the manufacturer, to grant a new type approval. Or it may apply the revision procedure (para. 6.1.1.) and, if applicable, the extension procedure (para. 6.1.2.). The conformity of production procedures must comply with Schedule 1 of the Agreement (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3 and Amend.1). Annex 1 adds items 5.1. to 8., and the approval mark examples in Annex 2 now refer to the 02 series of amendments.

10.13.
11.14.
49 more changes in this group — open in Compare
See every change side by side in Compare

Q2Why it changed

Proposed by
Expert from the Netherlands
Working party
GRSP, 70th session (December 2021)

Reasons

  • The technical provisions on post-crash electrical safety in UN GTR No. 20 are adopted for UN Regulation No. 135. The proposal aims to introduce requirements concerning post-crash electrical safety in the event of a pole side impact collision.

    Sources (2)
    “The technical provisions on post-crash electrical safety in global technical regulation (UN GTR) No. 20 are adopted for UN Regulation No. 135.”
    “The text reproduced below was prepared by the expert from the Netherlands to introduce requirements concerning post-crash electrical safety in the event of a pole side impact collision.”
  • The GRSP report says the proposal aimed at introducing requirements for post-crash electrical safety in a pole side impact collision. It says this was as agreed for UN Regulation No. 94 (Frontal collision) and proposed for UN Regulation No. 12.

    Source
    “aimed at introducing requirements for post-crash electrical safety in the event of a pole side impact collision, as was agreed for UN Regulation No. 94 (Frontal collision) and proposed for UN Regulation No. 12”
  • The administrative provisions are adapted to revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.

    Source
    “The administrative provisions are adapted to revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.”
  • The proposal says that the technical requirements modified by the 02 series do not affect the specification of non-electrified vehicles. Therefore, it says there is no need to differentiate the transitional provisions for electrified and non-electrified vehicles. It says the standardized provisions of the general guideline (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.3) can be used.

    Sources (2)
    “The technical requirements modified by the 02 series of amendments do not affect the specification of non-Electrified Vehicles.”
    “there is no need to differentiate the transitional provisions for electrified vehicles and non-electrified vehicles and the standardized provisions given in the general guideline (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.3) can be used”
  • For paragraph 11.8., the proposal says it is not clear whether “the preceding series” is singular or plural in English. The proposal understands that it should mean “any of the preceding series”. The added phrase “provided the transitional provisions …” is to clarify that the possibilities given in earlier series of amendments are still valid.

    Sources (2)
    “However, it is not clear whether "the preceding series" is singular or plural in its English version.”
    “With the understanding that it should mean "any of the preceding series", the additional phrase "provided the transitional provisions …" is supplemented in order to clarify that the possibilities given in such earlier series of amendments are still valid.”

Document trail

  1. —ProposalGRSP-69-10Earlier proposal by the expert from the Netherlands
  2. 2021-09ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2021/21Proposal by the expert from the Netherlands
  3. —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/70Session report, para. 23: adoption, deleting the square brackets in paragraph 11.7.
  4. 2022-04Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2022/71Text that GRSP sent to WP.29 and AC.1
  5. 2022-06WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1166Adopted at the 187th session (session report, para. 182)
  6. 2023-01-04In forceC.N.495.2022.TREATIES-XI.B.16.135UN depositary notification

Q3Who is affected

Vehicle manufacturer

  • Make sure the high voltage buses meet at least one paragraph 5.6.1. criterion after the impact.
  • Make sure that there is no evidence of fire or explosion from the REESS for 60 minutes after the impact.
  • Make sure that at least one component anchorage, bracket or load-transferring structure keeps the REESS attached to the vehicle.
  • Provide a method to confirm the SOC when the vehicle is tested (Annex 3, paragraph 7.1.3.).
  • Check new approvals to the preceding series against the date 1 September 2023 (para. 11.7.).

Component supplier

  • Check your REESS design against the electrolyte spillage (para. 5.6.2.) and fire hazard (para. 5.6.4.) requirements.

Technical service / Approval authority

  • Add the Annex 11 test procedures to your test plans for vehicles equipped with electric power train.
  • Check that the SOC at the test meets the minimum of Annex 3, paragraph 7.1.3.
  • For a separate impact test requested for paragraph 5.6., check electrical components do not influence occupant protection performance (paras. 5.3.–5.5.).

See every change side by side

RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.

ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.

More UN R135 change reports

All UN R135 change reports