UN R95 Base text (05 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 95 (ECE R95) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants, fuel system integrity and protection against electrical shock in the event of a lateral collision.
UN R95 — 05 series of amendments
Changes from 04 series of amendments
- What changed
- Under the low electrical energy criterion, the total energy (TE) on the high voltage buses must be less than 0.2 joules, instead of 2.0 joules.
- New paragraph 5.3.7.4. requires no evidence of fire or explosion from the REESS from the impact until 60 minutes after the impact.
- For vehicles having an electric power train operating on high voltage, preceding-series type-approvals first issued after 1 September 2023 need not be accepted.
- Why
- The technical provisions of UN GTR No. 20 on post-crash electrical safety are adopted for UN Regulation No. 95.
- The administrative provisions are adapted for revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.
- For the affected vehicles, the proposal recommends aligning the implementation timing with the UN Regulation No. 100 amendment for transposing UN GTR No. 20.
Q1What changed227 changes
Protection against electrical shock after the impact (paras. 5.3.7. to 5.3.7.1.4.2.)
Under the low electrical energy criterion, the total energy (TE) on the high voltage buses must be less than 0.2 joules, instead of 2.0 joules. The energy stored in the Y-capacitors (TEy1, TEy2) must also be less than 0.2 joules, instead of 2.0 joules. The absence of high voltage criterion now adds the words “within 60 s after the impact”. Physical protection now limits the resistance between any two simultaneously reachable exposed conductive parts of electrical protection barriers/enclosures to less than 0.2 Ω. This applies to parts less than 2.5 m from each other, when there is current flow of at least 0.2 A. Paragraph 5.3.7.1.4.2. now gives three options, (a), (b) and (c), for conductively connected AC and DC high voltage buses.
Electrolyte leakage, REESS retention and REESS fire hazards (paras. 5.3.7.2. to 5.3.7.4.)
For an aqueous electrolyte REESS, the leakage requirements now apply from the impact until 60 minutes after the impact, instead of 30 minutes. No more than 7 per cent by volume of the REESS electrolyte, with a maximum of 5.0 l, may leak outside the passenger compartment. A non-aqueous electrolyte REESS must not leak liquid electrolyte into the passenger or luggage compartment or outside the vehicle within 60 minutes of the impact. The REESS must now remain attached to the vehicle by at least one component anchorage, bracket, or structure that transfers loads to the vehicle structure. Before, a REESS located inside the passenger compartment had to remain in the location in which it was installed. New paragraph 5.3.7.4. requires no evidence of fire or explosion from the REESS from the impact until 60 minutes after the impact.
Definitions and the term “electric power train” (paras. 2.16. to 2.48., 3.2.6.)
Throughout the Regulation, the term “electrical power train” is replaced with “electric power train”. New paragraphs 2.41. to 2.48. define aqueous and non-aqueous electrolyte, electrolyte leakage, normal operating conditions, specific voltage condition, State of Charge, fire and explosion. In the definition of “Live parts” (para. 2.19.), “in normal use” is now “under normal operating conditions”. In paragraph 2.20., “which becomes electrically energized” is now “which is not normally energized, but which can become electrically energized”. Paragraph 2.16. now says which batteries are not considered as a REESS, and what the REESS may include. Paragraph 2.31. now says when only components or parts of an electric circuit that operate on high voltage are classified as a high voltage bus.
Electric power train adjustment and procedures for SOC adjustment (Annex 4, paras. 5.11. to 5.11.2.1.)
Annex 4, paragraph 5.11.1. now gives the procedures for SOC adjustment. Before, the paragraph said that the REESS “shall be at any state of charge, which allows the normal operation of the power train”. The adjustment of SOC must be conducted at an ambient temperature of 20 ± 10 °C. Where different charging procedures are possible, the REESS must be charged using the procedure which yields the highest SOC. When the vehicle is tested, a REESS designed to be externally charged must have no less than 95 per cent of this SOC. For a REESS designed to be charged only by an energy source on the vehicle, the minimum is 90 per cent.
Test procedures for the vehicles equipped with electric power train (Annex 9)
In Annex 9, the voltage symbols V, Vb, V1, V1’, V2 and V2’ are replaced with U, Ub, U1, U1’, U2 and U2’. For voltage measurement and the low electrical energy assessment, the earliest time is now 10 seconds after the impact, instead of 5 seconds. In the Total Energy formulas for the X-capacitors and the Y-capacitors, “– 3 600” is deleted. Paragraph 4.1. now gives two test methods for measuring electric resistance: a resistance tester, or a DC power supply, voltmeter and ammeter. Paragraph 5.2. now gives two methods to measure isolation resistance: DC voltage from external sources, or the vehicle's own REESS as DC voltage source. The appendix to Annex 9 is deleted, and the jointed test finger is now described in Figure 3.
New transitional provisions (para. 11.) and renumbered paragraph 10.
From the 05 series' official date of entry into force, no Contracting Party applying this Regulation may refuse to grant or accept its type-approvals. Paragraph 11.2. sets a date for vehicles having an electric power train operating on high voltage. From 1 September 2023, Contracting Parties are not obliged to accept type-approvals of these vehicles to the preceding series, first issued after that date. Contracting Parties must not refuse to grant type-approvals to any preceding series of amendments or extensions thereof. Former paragraph 10. is deleted, and former paragraph 11. is renumbered as paragraph 10.
Approval, modifications, conformity of production, withdrawal and discontinued production (paras. 4.2. to 9.)
Paragraph 4.2. now assigns approval numbers in accordance with Schedule 4 of the Agreement (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3). After a modification is notified, the Type Approval Authority may decide, in consultation with the manufacturer, that a new type approval is to be granted. Or it may apply the revision procedure (para. 6.1.1.) and, if applicable, the extension procedure (para. 6.1.2.). Former paragraphs 6.1.2.1. and 6.1.2.2. on a repeated or partial test after a modification are deleted. The conformity of production procedure must comply with Schedule 1 of the Agreement (E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3). Withdrawals and discontinued production are now notified with a copy of the approval form with a signed and dated annotation.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Experts from Japan and the European Commission on behalf of the Task Force
- Working party
- GRSP, 67th session (July 2020)
Reasons
The technical provisions of UN GTR No. 20 are adopted for UN Regulation No. 95 with respect to post-crash electrical safety. The proposal was prepared to amend the requirements for post-crash electrical safety in the event of lateral collision.
Sources (2)
“The technical provisions of UN Global Technical Regulation No.20 (UN GTR No. 20) are adopted for UN Regulation No.95 with respect to the post-crash electrical safety.”
“to amend the requirements concerning post-crash electrical safety in the event of lateral collision”
The administrative provisions are adapted for revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.
Source
“Administrative provisions are adapted for the revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement.”
The proposal says that the amendments only relate to vehicles with an electric power train operating at high voltage. For this reason, it says the validity of existing approvals for vehicles without an electric power train is not affected.
Source
“Since the proposed amendments are only related to the vehicles with electric power train operating at high voltage, the validity of the existing approvals for vehicles not with electric power train are not affected.”
For the vehicles affected by this series, the proposal recommends aligning the implementation timing with the UN Regulation No. 100 amendment. That amendment is for transposing UN GTR No. 20.
Source
“For the vehicles affected by this series of amendment, it is recommended to align the implementation timing with the amendment of UN Regulation No. 100 for transposing UN GTR No. 20.”
Document trail
- 2020-02ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/5Proposal by the experts from Japan and the European Commission on behalf of the Task Force
- —RevisedGRSP-67-21-Rev.1Changes to the REESS definition in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/5 by the expert from Japan
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/67Session report, para. 18: adoption as amended by Annex VII
- 2020-08Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/108Text that GRSP sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2020-11WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1155Adopted at the 182nd session (session report, para. 133)
- 2021-06-09In forceC.N.192.2021.TREATIES-XI.B.16.95UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- For the low electrical energy criterion, make sure that TE on the high voltage buses is below 0.2 joules.
- Make sure that there is no evidence of fire or explosion from the REESS for 60 minutes after the impact.
- Make sure that at least one component anchorage, bracket or load-transferring structure keeps the REESS attached to the vehicle.
- Provide a method to confirm the SOC when the vehicle is tested (Annex 4, paragraph 5.11.1.3.).
- For vehicles having an electric power train operating on high voltage, plan for 1 September 2023 in paragraph 11.2.
Component supplier
- Check your REESS design against the changed electrolyte leakage requirements (para. 5.3.7.2.) and the new fire hazard requirement (para. 5.3.7.4.).
Technical service / Approval authority
- Update your Annex 9 test plans to the new earliest voltage measurement time of 10 seconds after the impact.
- Update your Total Energy calculation to the new formulas (b) and (c) in Annex 9.
- Check that the SOC at the test meets the minimum of Annex 4, paragraph 5.11.1.3.
- Add the paragraph 4 test procedures of Annex 9 to your test plans for non-welded connections and cases of doubt.
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.
More UN R95 change reports
- 06 series — Supplement 3
- 06 series — Supplement 2
- 06 series — Supplement 1
- 06 series — Base text
- 05 series — Supplement 5
- 05 series — Supplement 4
- 05 series — Supplement 3
- 05 series — Supplement 2
- 05 series — Supplement 1
- 04 series — Supplement 3
- 04 series — Supplement 2
- 04 series — Supplement 1
- 04 series — Base text
- 03 series — Supplement 7