UN R134 Base text (02 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 134 (ECE R134) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles and their components with regard to the safety-related performance of Hydrogen-Fuelled Vehicles (HFCV).
UN R134 — 02 series of amendments
Changes from 01 series of amendments (supplement 2)
- What changed
- Annex 3 now gives a two-stage localized/engulfing fire test for the CHSS: a localized fire stage followed by an engulfing stage.
- The CHSS date of removal from service is now at most 25 years after the date of manufacture, instead of 15 years (or 20 years).
- From 1 September 2027, Contracting Parties applying this Regulation are not obliged to accept approvals to the preceding series first issued after 1 September 2027.
- Why
- The draft series was presented to incorporate provisions on hydrogen-fuelled vehicles harmonized with UN GTR No. 13, Amendment 1.
- In UN GTR No. 13, a new assessment shows that 11,000 cycles will sufficiently represent a 25-year service life.
- Type approval needs three stages, mostly by different manufacturers, so there should be sufficient time before the mandatory application.
Q1What changed701 changes
Footnote 1, definitions and information document references (paras. 1.2. to 2.31., 3.1.2. and 3.2.2.)
The CHSS definition now names container attachments (if any) and all primary closure devices, instead of pressure relief devices (PRDs) and shut off device(s). New paragraphs 2.5., 2.18., 2.20., 2.25. and 2.26. define “Container Attachments”, “Passenger compartment”, REESS, HRR/A and “State of charge (SOC)”. The SOC definition refers to new Table 1, which lists the compressed hydrogen density (g/l) at different pressures and temperatures. The definitions of “Exhaust point of discharge” and “Safety relief valve” are deleted. In paragraph 2.12., hydrogen fuel for the vehicles is now specified in ISO 14687:2019 and SAE J2719_202003. Footnote 1 to paragraph 1 no longer lists full width frontal impact among the post-crash cases that the Regulation does not cover.
CHSS requirements and the Annex 7 reduced test programme (paras. 5. to 5.6.)
Primary closure devices must include TPRD, check valve and shut-off valve functions (which may be combined) and be mounted directly on or within each container. The minimum burst pressure BPmin is now 200 per cent NWP, instead of 225 per cent NWP. In the baseline initial pressure cycle life test, leakage must not occur within 11,000 cycles; the 15,000-cycle value for a 20-year service life is deleted. The manufacturer now determines the CHSS service life, and the date of removal from service is at most 25 years after the date of manufacture. In the fire test, the CHSS must vent below 1 MPa within 1 hour (M1, N1) or 2 hours (M2, M3, N2, N3). Annex 7 now says that deviations from the reduced test programme table may be allowed if equivalent safety can be ensured.
Annex 3 test procedures and the two-stage localized/engulfing fire test
Annex 3, paragraph 5. now gives the two-stage localized/engulfing fire test: a localized fire stage followed by an engulfing stage. The former fire test methods (Method 1, generic vehicle installation; Method 2, specific vehicle installation) and the former engulfing fire test are deleted. The burner has a localized burner zone and an engulfing burner extension, and both must be LPG-fired. The burner pre-test checkout uses a 320 mm diameter pre-test cylinder. The pre-test must be performed at least once before CHSS fire tests, and repeated if the burner and test setup is modified.
TPRD, check valve and shut-off valve requirements (paras. 6.1., 6.2. and Annex 4)
Paragraph 6.1. adds the atmospheric exposure test (Annex 4, paragraph 1.11.) to the TPRD performance requirements. Paragraph 6.2. now covers check valves and shut-off valves, instead of check valves and automatic shut-off valves. The pre-cooled hydrogen exposure test (Annex 4, paragraph 2.10.) is deleted. Five TPRD units now undergo 15,000 internal pressure cycles, instead of 11,000 (15-year service life) or 15,000 (20-year service life). The total number of operational cycles is now 15,000 for the check valve and 50,000 for the shut-off valve, without separate 20-year service life values.
Vehicle fuel system and post-crash integrity (paras. 7. to 7.2.4.3., Annexes 5 and 8)
New paragraph 7.1.1.5. requires the fuelling receptacle geometry to conform to ISO 17268:2020 and be compatible with “specification H35, H35HF or H70 depending on its nominal working pressure and specific application”. TPRD hydrogen discharge from the CHSS must also not impinge upon the vehicle’s REESS. For frontal impact, paragraph 7.2. now uses UN Regulation No. 94, Annex 3 and UN Regulation No. 137, Annex 3, “only to the extent where the UN Regulations apply as prescribed in their scope”. The post-crash requirement is deemed met if the vehicle equipped with CHSS is approved to “UN Regulation No. 94 (05 series of amendments or later) or UN Regulation No. 137 (03 series of amendments or later) for frontal impact and UN Regulation No. 95 (06 series of amendments or later) for lateral impact”, as applicable in their scope. Where the frontal or lateral impact test does not apply, the position limits now apply to the CHSS primary closure devices instead of the container. At the request of the manufacturer, the CHSS may be tested to new Annex 8 as alternative to paragraph 7.2.4.2.
Conformity of production and CHSS sampling tests (paras. 9. to 9.2.3.2.)
Paragraph 9.1. now refers to the general provisions in Schedule 1 to the Agreement (E/ECE/324‑E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3 and amend.1), instead of Appendix 2. The former general provisions of paragraphs 9.1. and 9.2. are deleted. Paragraph 9.2.1. requires a pressure test of every container or, “upon agreement of the Type Approval Authority, every pressure bearing chamber of CHSS”. The target pressure is ≥ 125 per cent NWP, held for ≥ 30 seconds; before, every container was tested at ≥ 150 per cent of NWP. A batch is at most 200 units or one shift of successive production, whichever is greater; at least one random CHSS per batch is tested. “Upon request by the manufacturer after completion of at least 20 sequential batches, including at least 2,000 finished containers, complying with the requirements of paragraph 9.2.2.1.”, the type approval authority may recognise alternative sampling procedures.
Transitional provisions and approval marks (paras. 13.1., 13.6. to 13.9. and Annex 2)
As from “the official date of entry into force of the 02 series of amendments”, Contracting Parties applying this Regulation must not refuse to grant or accept approvals under the 02 series of amendments. From 1 September 2027, Contracting Parties applying this Regulation are not obliged to accept approvals to the preceding series first issued after 1 September 2027. Contracting Parties applying this Regulation must continue to accept approvals to any preceding series first issued before 1 September 2027, “provided the transitional provisions in these respective previous series of amendments foresee this possibility”. Contracting Parties applying this Regulation may grant approvals according to any preceding series, and must continue to grant extensions of existing approvals to those series. In Annex 2, the approval mark examples now refer to the 02 series of amendments.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Task force amending UN Regulation No.134
- Working party
- GRSP, 73rd session (May 2023)
Reasons
The text was prepared to transpose Amendment 1 to UN GTR No. 13, Phase 2 (GTR13-PH2), into the UN Regulation. Amendment 1 contains improvements to promote technical harmonisation, reproducibility of the test requirements, higher clarity and consistency, and adaptation to technical progress. Refuelling receptacle geometry of UN GTR No. 13, Part I is included to achieve complete reciprocal recognition of approval between the European Union and Japan.
Sources (3)
“in order to transpose amendment 1 to UN Global Technical Regulation No. 13, Phase 2 (GTR13-PH2) into the UN Regulation under the 1958 Agreement”
“This proposal contains numbers of improvements to the original UN GTR to promote technical harmonisation and to achieve enhanced reproducibility and reproducibility of the test requirements, higher clarity and consistency, adaptation to technical progress and so on.”
“geometrical requirements of refuelling receptacle as described in the Part I of UN GTR No. 13 are also included in order to achieve complete reciprocal recognition of the approval between the European Union and Japan”
In UN GTR No. 13, a new assessment shows that 11,000 cycles will sufficiently represent a 25-year service life. For this reason, the extrapolated 15,000 cycles for a 20-year service life are deleted.
Sources (2)
“In UN GTR No. 13, the new assessment shows that 11,000 cycles will sufficiently represent a 25-year service life.”
“Therefore, the extrapolated number of 15,000 cycles for a 20-year service life in the current Regulation is deleted.”
UN Regulation No. 137 for full-wrap frontal impact has been adopted and applied in most of the Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement. For this reason, both UN Regulations No. 94 and No. 137 are required to the extent where they apply as prescribed in their scope. The shape of the acceleration pulse is defined to make sure that the tests are repeatable and reproducible. The distance requirements apply to primary closure devices because these are considered more vulnerable in crash situations.
Sources (4)
“Since UN Regulation No. 137 for full-wrap frontal impact has been adopted and applied in most of the Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement, both UN Regulation No. 94 and UN Regulation No. 137 are required”
“both UN Regulation No. 94 and UN Regulation No. 137 are required to the extent where the Regulations apply as prescribed in their scope”
“the shape of acceleration pulse is defined in order to ensure the repeatability and reproducibility of the tests”
“the application of such distance requirements are changed from container to primary closure devices because these are considered more vulnerable in the crash situations”
Following Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement, the general provisions in former paragraphs 9.1. and 9.2. are considered redundant with reference to its Schedule 1. To accommodate the increase of the production volume, an alternative sampling test with a reduced sampling rate is proposed.
Sources (2)
“With reference to the Schedule 1 of the 58 Agreement, the general provisions in former paragraphs 9.1. and 9.2. are considered as redundant.”
“In order to accommodate the increase of the production volume, the alternative possibility to apply sampling test with reduced sampling rate is proposed.”
Type approval under this Regulation requires three stages, mostly by different manufacturers, and some tests require considerable duration. Accordingly, there should be sufficient time before the mandatory application of the amendments. The number of hydrogen-fuelled vehicles approved to existing versions will be limited, so applying the amendment to existing types will make little sense.
Sources (4)
“require three stages of type approvals mostly by different manufacturers”
“These processes may need to be taken in series where some of the tests require considerable duration to conduct.”
“Accordingly, there should be sufficient time provided before the mandatory application of the proposed amendments after the entry into force.”
“the number of hydrogen-fuelled vehicles approved in accordance with existing versions of UN Regulation No.134 will be limited and therefore the application of this amendment for existing types will make little sense”
Document trail
- —ProposalGRSP-72-17Proposal by the task force, distributed at the 72nd GRSP session
- 2023-02RevisedECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2023/8Proposal based on GRSP-72-17, with further task force amendments
- —Amended in sessionGRSP-73-54Amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2023/8, adopted with it
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/73GRSP session report, para. 37
- 2023-08Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2023/110Text that GRSP sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2023-11WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1175Adopted at the 191st session (session report, para. 180)
- 2024-06-15In forceC.N.316.2024.TREATIES-XI.B.16.134UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- Check post-crash fuel system integrity in UN Regulation No. 137 frontal tests where that Regulation applies in its scope.
- Where the frontal or lateral impact test does not apply, check the position of the CHSS primary closure devices.
- Make sure the receptacle geometry conforms to ISO 17268:2020, with H35, H35HF or H70 by nominal working pressure and application.
- Make sure that TPRD hydrogen discharge from the CHSS does not impinge upon the vehicle’s REESS.
Component supplier
- Test TPRDs with non-metallic materials exposed to the atmosphere during normal operating conditions in the new atmospheric exposure test.
- Test the CHSS in the two-stage localized/engulfing fire test, filled to 100 per cent SOC with compressed hydrogen.
- Set the CHSS date of removal from service at not more than 25 years after the date of manufacture.
- Run the paragraph 9.2.3. tests on at least one randomly sampled CHSS from each batch of CHSS produced.
Technical service / Approval authority
- Be ready to run the two-stage fire test, including the burner pre-test checkout with a 320 mm diameter pre-test cylinder.
- Agree the test pressure with the manufacturer for tests under Annex 8, Part 1.
- Be ready for manufacturer requests for alternative sampling after at least 20 sequential batches including at least 2,000 finished containers.
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.