UN R129 Supplement 11 (03 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 129 (ECE R129) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of Enhanced Child Restraint Systems used on board of motor vehicles (ECRS).
UN R129 — Supplement 11 to the 03 series of amendments
Supplement 10 → 11
- What changed
- Paragraph 6.1.3.4. now says that Enhanced Child Restraint Systems of the booster seat and booster cushion categories must have only one adult safety-belt route.
- Paragraph 6.6.4.1.2.2. requires dynamic tests in a vehicle body shell or complete vehicle for Specific Vehicle ECRS with attachment methods not defined in this Regulation. These tests must be carried out for each vehicle specified in the ECRS car fitting list.
- In booster cushion frontal impact tests on the Annex 6 test bench, the technical service can decide to install an optional dummy protective device.
- Why
- During the amendment of paragraph 6.1.3.4. by Supplement 3 to the 03 series, the requirement to have one belt route on boosters was inadvertently deleted.
- The proposal aims to clarify the conditions under which Enhanced Child Restraint Systems must be tested in a vehicle body shell.
- The expert from France clarified that a headrest on the bench would allow testing of the universal booster cushion without damaging the dummy's neck.
Q1What changed19 changes
One adult safety-belt route for booster seats and booster cushions (para. 6.1.3.4.)
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems of the booster seat and booster cushion categories must have only one adult safety-belt route. They must also have a main load-bearing contact point between the Enhanced Child Restraint System and the adult safety belt. Before this supplement, paragraph 6.1.3.4. did not mention the adult safety-belt route.
i-Size and Universal category Enhanced Child Restraint Systems on the test bench (para. 6.6.4.1.1.)
Paragraph 6.6.4.1.1. now says that i-Size and Universal category Enhanced Child Restraint Systems must be tested on the test bench prescribed in Annex 6. The test must be in conformity with paragraph 7.1.3.1. Before this supplement, the paragraph did not name the Universal category.
Test ways for Specific Vehicle Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (paras. 6.6.4.1.2. and 6.6.4.1.2.1.)
Paragraph 6.6.4.1.2. says that Specific Vehicle Enhanced Child Restraint Systems must be tested in one of the following ways. Its earlier text on the fit assessment with each vehicle model and on reducing the number of vehicle arrangements tested is deleted. Paragraph 6.6.4.1.2.1. covers Specific Vehicle ECRS that attach to the car using the adult seat belt or ISOFIX attachments that comply with paragraph 6.3.3. These must be dynamically tested on the Annex 6 test bench, in conformity with paragraph 7.1.3.1. For Specific Vehicle ISOFIX ECRS, this applies only if they have an anti-rotation device that conforms to paragraph 6.3.4. or 6.3.5. As an alternative, these Specific Vehicle ECRS can be tested in a vehicle body shell in conformity with paragraph 7.1.3.2.
Specific Vehicle Enhanced Child Restraint Systems with attachment methods not defined in this Regulation (para. 6.6.4.1.2.2.)
Specific Vehicle ECRS that use attachment methods not defined in this Regulation must be dynamically tested in a vehicle body shell or a complete vehicle. The body shell test is in conformity with paragraph 7.1.3.2., and the complete vehicle test with paragraph 7.1.3.3. Notwithstanding paragraph 6.6.4.1.2.2.1., these tests must be carried out for each vehicle specified in the ECRS car fitting list. Specific Vehicle ISOFIX ECRS without an anti-rotation device conforming to paragraph 6.3.4. or 6.3.5. are also covered if they use the vehicle seat cushion instead. They use it to limit the pitch rotation of the ECRS in a front impact. Before this supplement, this paragraph referred to paragraph 6.3. and to the envelopes defined in UN Regulation No. 16, Annex 17.
Fit assessment and vehicle body shell parts (para. 6.6.4.1.2.2.1.)
Before the dynamic test in a vehicle body shell, the ECRS must be assessed for fit with every vehicle in the ECRS car fitting list. The Technical Service must then make sure that sufficient parts of each vehicle body shell are used in the dynamic test. These parts must be representative of the vehicle structures and impact surfaces, including the vehicle seat cushions and underlying structures. The Technical Service may also reduce the number of vehicles tested if they do not differ greatly in the aspects listed above. However, testing at simple extremes of differences in dimensions or material properties is not allowed.
Optional dummy protective device for booster cushion frontal impact tests (para. 7.1.3.1.1.8., Annex 6, para. 3.4. and Appendix 5)
New paragraph 7.1.3.1.1.8. covers frontal impact tests of a booster cushion on the test bench prescribed in Annex 6. In these tests, the technical service can decide to install an optional dummy protective device, as described in Annex 6, paragraph 3.4. The device may be covered with the Polychloropren foam of the lateral impact door (Appendix 3) or an alternative material, as the technical service decides. The forward face of the device must be parallel with the back of the backrest. The device must not interfere with the dummy and/or the adult 3-point belt during the dynamic test until the maximum horizontal head excursion is reached. New Appendix 5 to Annex 6 gives Figure 1 of the optional dummy protective device, with all dimensions in millimetres.
Annex 27: test report template and test bench type
The title of Annex 27 is now “Type approval test report template”. Before this supplement, it was “List of Minimum Contents for The Test Reports included in the Type Approval Application”. A new entry asks for the “Test Bench Type (Test on trolley+standard seat/Test in car body)”. If testing in car body, the make/model must be specified.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Expert from the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA)
- Working party
- GRSP, 74th session (December 2023)
Reasons
Supplement 3 to the 03 series added provisions for booster cushions, including an amendment to paragraph 6.1.3.4. During that amendment, the requirement to have one belt route on boosters was inadvertently deleted. Paragraph 3.2.2. also has this requirement, but it is preferable to reinsert it in paragraph 6.1.3.4. for consistency.
Sources (3)
“Supplement 3 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 added provisions for booster cushions. This included an amendment to paragraph 6.1.3.4.”
“During the amendment of paragraph 6.1.3.4., the requirement to have one belt route on boosters was inadvertently deleted.”
“Although this requirement is also made in paragraph 3.2.2., it is preferable to reinsert it in paragraph 6.1.3.4., for consistency.”
The proposal aims to clarify the conditions under which Enhanced Child Restraint Systems must be tested in a vehicle body shell. CLEPA believed that a broader amendment of paragraph 6.6.4.1.2., including paragraphs 6.6.4.1.2.1. and 6.6.4.1.2.2., was needed to make the intent of the Regulation absolutely clear.
Sources (3)
“aiming to clarify the conditions under which Enhanced Child Restraint Systems must be tested in a vehicle body shell”
“but also believed that a broader amendment of paragraph 6.6.4.1.2 (including both 6.6.4.1.2.1. and 6.6.4.1.2.2.) was needed to make the intent of the regulation absolutely clear.”
“to clarify the choice of the dynamic test on a vehicle body shell or on the test bench.”
The proposal would allow a headrest on the bench in the dynamic frontal test of a universal booster cushion with a Q10 dummy. The expert from France clarified that this would allow testing of the universal booster cushion without damaging the neck of the dummy.
Sources (2)
“She recalled that the proposal would allow installation of a headrest on the bench in the dynamic frontal test of a universal booster cushion with a Q10 dummy.”
“She clarified that this would allow testing of the universal booster cushion, without damaging the neck of the dummy.”
Proposer's reason (informal document GRSP-74-29-Rev.1)
UN Regulation No. 129 requires all Q10 and Q6 criteria (head displacements and injury criteria) to be met within 300 ms, including the rebound phase. During the rebound phase, an important extension of the Q10 neck can be observed, due to the absence of a headrest on the bench. This could damage the Q10 neck.
Submitted by Expert from France. Working party adoption: ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/74, para. 28.
Sources (3)
“The UN Regulation No. 129 imposes that all the criteria (head displacements and injury criterias) of Q10 and Q6 must be respected within a time interval of 300 ms, which includes the rebound phase”
“But during the rebound phase of the test, an important extension of the neck of Q10 can be observed, due to the absence of headrest positioned on the bench.”
“This could damage the Q10 neck.”
Document trail
- 2023-09ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2023/38Proposal by the expert from the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA)
- —ProposalGRSP-74-29-Rev.1Proposal by the expert from France on a dummy protective device
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/74Session report, paras. 25 and 28
- 2024-04Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2024/43/Rev.1Revised text that GRSP sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2024-06WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1179Adopted at the 193rd session (session report, para. 162)
- 2025-01-10In forceC.N.60.2025.TREATIES-XI.B.16.129UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- No direct action for this role.
Component supplier
- No direct action for this role.
Technical service / Approval authority
- For booster cushion frontal impact tests on the Annex 6 test bench, decide on the optional dummy protective device.
- In body shell tests, make sure the parts used represent the vehicle seat cushions and underlying structures.
- If you test fewer vehicles, do not test at simple extremes of differences in dimensions or material properties.
- Update your type approval test reports to show the test bench type and, for car body tests, the make/model.
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.
More UN R129 change reports
- 05 series — Supplement 1
- 05 series — Base text
- 04 series — Supplement 6
- 04 series — Supplement 5
- 04 series — Supplement 4
- 04 series — Supplement 3
- 04 series — Supplement 2
- 04 series — Supplement 1
- 04 series — Base text
- 03 series — Supplement 12
- 03 series — Supplement 10
- 03 series — Supplement 9
- 03 series — Supplement 8
- 03 series — Supplement 7
- 03 series — Supplement 6
- 03 series — Supplement 5