UN R10 Supplement 2 (07 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 10 (ECE R10) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to electromagnetic compatibility.
UN R10 — Supplement 2 to the 07 series of amendments
Supplement 1 → 2
- What changed
- The starting profile of ISO 16750-2 now replaces test pulse 4 of ISO 7637-2:2004 in ESA immunity tests.
- Paragraphs 7.12.2.1. and 7.12.2.2. now list flicker limit values for ESA measurements to Annex 18.
- In Annex 4, paragraph 2.2., the settings for the traction battery state of charge (SOC) and the charging current are deleted.
- Why
- Pulse 4 refers to ISO 7637-2:2004, which is over twenty years old and makes the calibration, maintenance and repair of pulse generators more difficult.
- Paragraph 7.12.2. gave no specific flicker limit value for ESAs, unlike paragraph 7.4.2. for vehicles.
- The ESA test tables split only below and above 2 GHz, but some test methods are not suitable for higher frequency ranges.
Q1What changed269 changes
Starting profile instead of test pulse 4, and undated ISO 7637-2 references (paras. 6.7.1., 6.9.1., 7.19.1. and Annex 10)
In paragraph 6.9.1. and Annex 10, the starting profile of ISO 16750-2 now replaces test pulse 4 of ISO 7637-2:2004 for ESA immunity tests. Table 3a now gives the starting profile with immunity test level II for 12 V and 24 V systems and 10 pulses. The starting profile is tested to the functional status classification of ISO 16750-1; pulse 4 used the functional status of ISO 7637-2:2004. The starting profile applies only to ESAs that could be installed in vehicles with internal combustion engines started by a 12V/24V starter motor. References to ISO 7637-2:2011 in paragraphs 6.7.1. and 7.19.1. and in Annex 10 no longer give the year. The list of standards drops the 2004 edition of ISO 7637-2 and adds ISO 16750-1 (Fourth edition 2023) and ISO 16750-2 (Fifth edition 2023).
Frequency range of each ESA immunity test method and the new term LUF (paras. 2.34., 6.8.2.1. and 7.18.2.1.)
Tables 2a and 2b (paragraph 6.8.2.1.) and Tables 19a and 19b now give a frequency range for each ESA immunity test method. Before, these tables only split the band into 20 to 2,000 MHz and 2,000 to 6,000 MHz. Below 2 GHz, Stripline and BCI now cover 20 to 400 MHz, the TEM cell 20 to 200 MHz and ALSE 80 to 2,000 MHz. The reverberation chamber covers “LUF to 2,000 MHz”, and above 2 GHz, ALSE and the reverberation chamber cover 2,000 to 6,000 MHz. The test levels do not change. New paragraph 2.34. defines “Lowest usable frequency (LUF)” as the lowest frequency for which the field uniformity requirements are met.
Flicker limits for ESAs (paras. 7.12.2.1. and 7.12.2.2.)
For ESA measurements to Annex 18, paragraphs 7.12.2.1. and 7.12.2.2. now list the limit values for their two rated current ranges. Before, they only referred to IEC 61000-3-3 or IEC 61000-3-11, “paragraph 5”, and listed no values. In both paragraphs, the value of Pst must not be greater than 1.0, and the value of Plt must not be greater than 0.65. During a voltage change, d(t) must not exceed 3.3 per cent for more than 500 ms. The relative steady-state voltage change dc must not exceed 3.3 per cent, and the maximum relative voltage change dmax must not exceed 6 per cent. Paragraphs 7.4.2.1. and 7.4.2.2. for vehicles now also say “Clause 5” instead of “paragraph 5”.
Immunity test levels, field probes and standard editions (paras. 6.4.2.1. and 7.7.2.1., Annex 6)
Paragraphs 6.4.2.1. and 7.7.2.1. no longer say “rms” after the field strength and BCI current test levels. The test level values do not change. In Annex 6, paragraph 5.1.2., calibration for TLS must now use four horizontal field probes, not one field probe at the vehicle reference point. In Annex 6, Appendix 1, Figure 4, the key now names the antenna distance “D-bumper” instead of “D”. The figure now gives D-bumper with a tolerance of ±0.05, with dimensions in metres. The list of standards now gives the 2025 editions of ISO 11451-1, ISO 11451-2 and ISO 11452-1, not the 2015 editions.
Emission limit tables and detector parameters
The conducted disturbance tables for AC and DC power lines now give the quasi-peak limit and the average limit in separate columns. Before, one column “Limits and detector” gave both values. The limit values do not change. The tables of limit E (dBµV/m) at frequency F (MHz) for vehicles and ESAs now add “for a 120 kHz bandwidth”. The table for vehicle narrowband limits at 10 m also says that the limits must be measured with a 120 kHz bandwidth. In Annexes 5 and 8, the parameter tables no longer have peak detector columns and give only average detector values.
Charging mode conditions and paragraph numbers in Annex 4
In Annex 4, paragraph 2.2., the requirement to keep the traction battery SOC between 20 and 80 per cent of the maximum SOC is deleted. The two sentences that set the charging current for AC and DC charging, if the current consumption can be adjusted, are also deleted. The sentence on the average state of charge for multiple batteries stays, now with “shall” instead of “must”. Former paragraphs 2.3. to 2.3.3. are now 2.2.1. to 2.2.1.3., and former paragraphs 2.4. to 2.4.4. are now 2.2.2. to 2.2.2.4. Paragraph 3.1. now refers to Figure 2 of the Appendix to this Annex, not to “the Figure of the appendix”.
Wording, capital letters and references in the Regulation and its annexes
Many paragraphs in the annexes now write “Annex”, “Appendix” and “Figure” with a capital letter. Several references to clauses of IEC standards now say “Clause”, and several references to Appendix 8 now say “paragraph”. In several paragraphs, “must” now reads “shall”. Several annex titles now spell out “electrical/electronic sub-assemblies (ESAs)” or add “(ESAs)”. The footnote on R.E.3 now refers to document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.8 instead of Rev.6. Paragraph 3.2.8. now says that replacement ESAs “do not need a type approval” instead of “need no type approval”.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Experts from the Informal Working Group on Electromagnetic Compatibility (IWG EMC)
- Working party
- GRE, 93rd session (October 2025)
Reasons
Pulse 4 in ISO 7637-2:2004 refers to a standard that is over twenty years old. This makes the calibration, maintenance and repair of pulse generators more and more difficult. IWG EMC decided to replace pulse 4 with the starting profile of ISO 16750-2. Level 2 was considered the most comparable to pulse 4, although it is not technically identical.
Sources (4)
“Pulse 4 in ISO 7637-2:2004 refers to a standard that is over twenty years old, which increasingly complicates the calibration, maintenance, and repair of pulse generators.”
“IWG EMC decided to replace ‘Pulse 4’ with the ‘Starting profile’ defined in ISO 16750-2.”
“Level 2, which represents cold crank conditions with a good battery at cold temperature, was considered the most comparable to the previously applied pulse 4.”
“Although not technically identical, it offers a suitable approximation within current testing practice.”
The ESA test tables distinguished only between the frequency range below and above 2 GHz. This may be misleading, because some test methods, for example Stripline, TEM cell and BCI, are not suitable for higher frequency ranges. To avoid misunderstanding, the proposal specifies the frequency range of each test method more precisely. The new definition of LUF shows the valid starting frequency of the reverberation chamber method.
Sources (3)
“This may be misleading as some test methods - e.g., Stripline, TEM cell and BCI - are not suitable for higher frequency ranges”
“To avoid any misunderstanding, the frequency allocation for each test method should be specified more precisely”
“a definition of “Lowest usable frequency (LUF)” should be added to clearly indicate the valid starting frequency”
Paragraph 7.12.2. gave no specific flicker limit value for ESAs, unlike paragraph 7.4.2. for vehicles. The maximum relative voltage change (dmax) may vary with the test conditions. To align ESA and vehicle requirements and avoid misinterpretation, paragraph 7.12.2. now defines the flicker limit explicitly, based on the criteria of paragraph 7.4.2.
Sources (2)
“unlike paragraph 7.4.2., which defines clear flicker limits for vehicle, paragraph 7.12.2. does not provide a specific limit value for ESA.”
“To align the requirements for ESA with those for vehicle and avoid misinterpretation, paragraph 7.12.2. has been revised to explicitly define the flicker limit based on the criteria used in paragraph 7.4.2.”
ISO 11451-2:2015 requires only one field probe above 2 GHz, but ISO 11451-2:2025 requires four probes up to 6 GHz. The proposal updates the reference to ISO 11451-2 from the 2015 to the 2025 edition, to align with the latest calibration requirements and avoid misinterpretation. The proposal also updates the references to ISO 11451-1 and ISO 11452-1 to the 2025 editions.
Sources (3)
“ISO 11451-2:2015 requires only a single field probe above 2 GHz, whereas the updated ISO 11451-2:2025 mandates the use of four probes up to 6 GHz.”
“the reference to ISO 11451-2 should be updated from the 2015 to the 2025 edition to align with the latest calibration requirements and avoid misinterpretation.”
“Appendix 1, paragraphs 6 and 7 have been amended to update the referenced standards as follows”
The proposal removes the words “rms (root mean squared)” from paragraphs 6.4.2.1. and 7.7.2.1., because they may cause confusion. According to ISO 11451-1, the test severity level is based on the peak value of the modulated signal. The proposal calls this an editorial clarification without technical changes.
Sources (3)
“Mentions of ‘rms (root mean squared)’ should be removed from paragraphs 6.4.2.1 and 7.7.2.1., as they may lead to confusion.”
“According to ISO 11451-1, the test severity level is defined based on the peak value of the modulated signal.”
“This is an editorial clarification and does not imply any technical changes.”
Document trail
- 2025-08ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2025/25Proposal by IWG EMC
- —Amended in sessionGRE-93-20Further amendments by OICA and CLEPA that GRE adopted with the proposal
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/93Session report, para. 29
- 2025-12Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2026/29Text that GRE sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2026-03WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1190Adopted at the 198th session (session report, para. 114)
- 2026-09-30In forceC.N.397.2026.TREATIES-XI.B.16.10UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- Review Annex 4 charging mode test plans that still use the deleted SOC range and charging current settings.
- Update documents that quote Annex 4 paragraphs 2.3. to 2.4.4., because these paragraphs have new numbers.
Component supplier
- Check that ESAs for vehicles with engines started by a 12V/24V starter motor meet the starting profile of ISO 16750-2.
- Check ESA flicker results measured to Annex 18 against the limits now listed in paragraphs 7.12.2.1. and 7.12.2.2.
Technical service / Approval authority
- Where the starting profile applies, use 10 pulses at immunity test level II for 12 V and 24 V systems.
- Run each ESA immunity test method in the frequency range that the test level tables now give for it.
- For TLS calibration in Annex 6, use four horizontal field probes.
- In Annexes 5 and 8, use the average detector settings, the only ones the tables now give.
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.