UN R79 Supplement 13 (03 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 79 (ECE R79) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to steering equipment.
UN R79 — Supplement 13 to the 03 series of amendments
Supplement 12 → 13
- What changed
- New paragraph 5.3.3.6. gives an alternative to the 24 “figure of eight” manoeuvres of paragraph 5.3.3.3. for a shared energy source or electrical supply.
- Under this alternative, there must be an energy management system for the electrical storage device(s), with new warning signals in paragraph 5.4.2.1.5.
- “Initiation of the powertrain” replaces the “engine start/run cycle” wording in paragraphs 5.6.4.2.1. and 5.6.4.8.3. and in Annex 8.
- Why
- The CLEPA and OICA proposal intends to define the provisions for the approval of full power steering systems such as steer-by-wire systems.
- The original test of paragraph 5.3.3.3. seems inappropriate, especially for battery electric vehicles, which usually share the energy source with the propulsion.
- The United Kingdom proposal says that ‘engine’ or ‘run cycle’ implies a technology type and may retain a level of ambiguity.
Q1What changed67 changes
New definitions for electrical storage devices (paras. 2.12. to 2.17.)
New paragraphs 2.12. to 2.17. define “Electrical Storage Device (ESD)”, “Energy Management System” and “Electrical supply”. They also define the “performance” and the “state” of an electrical storage device, and the “effect of ageing”. The performance is the ability to provide power (W) and quantity of energy (Wh) when fully charged; the state is that ability at the time. Electrical storage devices connected in series and/or parallel are considered as one electrical storage device within this Regulation. An electrical supply is a device, for example a battery, REESS, generator or fuel-cell, that supplies electrical power to the steering system's electrical storage device(s).
Alternative for a shared energy source or electrical supply (paras. 5.3.1.8., 5.3.3.3., 5.3.3.5., 5.3.3.6. to 5.3.3.6.2.)
Paragraph 5.3.3.3. now also covers a failure of the electrical supply of the control transmission, not only of its energy source. Paragraph 5.3.3.6. may be used instead where the energy transmission, or a part of it, shares the control transmission's energy source or electrical supply. Under paragraph 5.3.1.8., a full power steering system that satisfies paragraph 5.3.3.6. is considered to have sufficient priority as specified in paragraphs 5.3.1.4. and 5.3.1.5. Paragraph 5.3.3.6.1. gives two conditions, depending on whether the failure affects the ability of the braking system to provide the service braking performance. If it does not, the vehicle must reach 10 km/h or less, or standstill; if it does, the vehicle must reach standstill. Paragraph 5.3.3.6.2. requires this before the energy level is too low for a further lane change, unless the failure leads to loss of propulsion.
Lane changes and deceleration under the alternative (paras. 5.3.3.6.3. to 5.3.3.6.6.)
Under paragraph 5.3.3.6.3., energy is deemed sufficient if 18 lane changes (M1, N1) or 9 (M2, M3, N2, N3) are possible within 90 s. They are driven at 20 km/h (+/- 2 km/h), alternately left and right, with at least 3 meters of lateral movement. The deceleration demand to reach the condition must not exceed 2 m/s², or up to 4 m/s² only where needed for paragraphs 5.3.3.6.2. and 5.3.3.6.3. The 4 m/s² case applies in specific conditions specified by the vehicle manufacturer and assessed as per Annex 6. Any automatic deceleration must start no earlier than 60 seconds after failure detection, unless the conditions of paragraphs 5.3.3.6.2. and/or 5.3.3.6.4. are met before. There must be a warning on the immediacy of the need to stop, with a dynamic indication of when automatic deceleration is expected to begin.
Energy management system (paras. 5.3.3.6.7. to 5.3.3.6.7.4.)
When the alternative to paragraph 5.3.3.3. is used, there must be an energy management system for the electrical storage device(s). It must be capable of continuously assessing the electrical storage device(s), to determine their ability to deliver the needed power to the steering transmission. If the assessment is not complete at switch-on, a red warning signal must be active until the safe status of the storage device(s) is confirmed. At type approval, the manufacturer must describe how the system determines the safe status, including after maintenance. The Technical Service must check the accuracy of the system under all reasonably foreseeable operating conditions, by reviewing the manufacturer's documentation and by tests. If a failure of the system or an input channel prevents the assessment, a red visual warning and an audible signal must be activated.
Warning signals (paras. 5.4.2.1.1., 5.4.2.1.5. to 5.4.2.1.5.2.)
The red warning signal of paragraph 5.4.2.1.1. now has a condition: a single additional failure could result in a complete loss of steering function. New paragraph 5.4.2.1.5. requires warning signals where an energy management system as per paragraph 5.3.3.6.7. is installed. With such a system, a yellow warning must be displayed no later than when ageing makes the storage device(s) performance insufficient for paragraph 5.3.3.6.3. This warning must come with information to the driver, for example an extra telltale or text message, that the storage device(s) require a maintenance check. A yellow warning is also due no later than when the storage device's state is insufficient for more than 60 seconds to fulfil paragraph 5.3.3.6.3. A red warning must also be displayed when the state of the ESD(s) is not sufficient for at least half the values in paragraph 5.3.3.6.3.
Mechanical steering parts and failures within the energy transmission (paras. 5.3.1.1., 5.3.3.4.)
In paragraph 5.3.1.1., “equivalent characteristics” of a material now has an example: “similar strength and fatigue life attributes”. If the manufacturer's safety concept prevents the 25 “figure of eight” manoeuvres, the manufacturer and the Technical Service must agree how to check the requirement. This procedure must be recorded in the test report and included in the type-approval documentation. If the safety concept also includes automatic braking to reduce the vehicle speed, the deceleration demand must not exceed 2 m/s². Any automatic deceleration demand must start no earlier than 60 seconds after failure detection. If another system, for example AEBS or ACC, controls the longitudinal movement, the vehicle may decelerate at a higher value or earlier.
“Initiation of the powertrain” wording (paras. 5.6.4.2.1., 5.6.4.8.3., Annex 8)
Paragraph 5.6.4.2.1. now sets the default off mode “at the initiation of the powertrain” instead of “at the initiation of each new engine start/run cycle”. A new engine start (or run cycle) performed automatically does not count as an “initiation of the powertrain” anywhere in this Regulation. A new footnote refers to Mutual Resolution No. 2 (M.R.2), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1121, for the definition. Paragraph 5.6.4.8.3. now uses “initiation of the powertrain” in place of “new engine start/run cycle (other than when performed automatically …)”. In Annex 8, the title of paragraph 3.5.7. is now “Initiation of the powertrain test” instead of “Engine start/run cycle test”. The Annex 8 test steps also now say “initiation of the powertrain”, and in two steps the driver initiates “a lane change procedure and manoeuvre”.
Q2Why it changed
- Proposed by
- Experts from CLEPA and OICA (full power steering systems) and expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“engine start / run cycle” terminology)
- Working party
- GRVA, 21st session (January 2025)
Reasons
The proposal intends to define the provisions for the approval of full power steering systems such as steer-by-wire systems. The original test of paragraph 5.3.3.3. seems inappropriate, especially for battery electric vehicles, which usually share the energy source with the propulsion.
Sources (2)
“The modifications proposed in this document intend to define the provisions for the approval of full power steering systems such as steer-by-wire systems.”
“The original test described in paragraph 5.3.3.3 seems inappropriate, especially for battery electric vehicles, which usually share the energy source with the propulsion.”
The new definitions, the energy management system requirements and the new warnings of paragraph 5.4.2.1.5. are aligned with UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H.
Sources (3)
“The new definitions proposed are aligned with the definitions laid out in UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H”
“The requirements regarding the Energy Management System and the means by which the system monitors the energy storage level are aligned with the requirements for Electrical Transmission Braking Systems as laid out in UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H”
“These requirements are aligned with the requirements for Electrical Transmission Braking Systems as laid out in UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H”
For paragraph 5.4.2.1.1., only failures which would result in a complete loss of steering function should be required to be shown in red. For safer designs providing more redundancy, a yellow warning as described in paragraph 5.4.2.1.2. is sufficient.
Source
“Only those failures which would result in a complete loss of steering function should be required to be shown in red. For safer designs providing more redundancy, a yellow warning as described in paragraph 5.4.2.1.2. is sufficient.”
Referring to ‘engine’ or ‘run cycle’ implies a technology type and may retain a level of ambiguity. The term ‘powertrain’ from M.R.2 is a generic term and simplifies the respective provisions.
Sources (3)
“Continuing to refer to ‘engine’ or ‘run cycle’ is still implying a technology type and therefore may retain a level of ambiguity.”
“Using the definition of ‘powertrain’ from M.R.2 provides a generic term”
“Also using the term ‘powertrain’ simplifies the respective provisions.”
Proposer's reason (informal document GRVA-21-11-Rev.2)
The 2 m/s² limit is intended to reduce the potential impact of automatic deceleration on following traffic and to ease lane change for the driver. A period of 60 seconds is considered a reasonable duration for a driver to react to a failure warning signal before the automatic system reaction.
Submitted by Experts from CLEPA and OICA. Working party adoption: ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/21, para. 93.
Sources (2)
“The proposal is reducing the maximum deceleration demand from 4m/s² to 2m/s². The intention is to reduce the potential impact of an automatic deceleration for the following traffic and to ease lane change for the driver.”
“60 seconds is considered as a reasonable duration for a driver to appropriately react to the occurrence of a failure warning signal, before the automatic system reaction occurs.”
Document trail
- 2024-11ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2025/7Proposal from CLEPA and OICA for full power steering systems
- 2024-11ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2025/6Proposal from the United Kingdom on the “engine start / run cycle” terminology
- —Amended in sessionGRVA-21-11-Rev.2Changes to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2025/7 from CLEPA and OICA
- —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/21Session report, para. 93
- 2025-04Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2025/61Text that GRVA sent to WP.29 and AC.1
- 2025-06WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1186Adopted at the 196th session (session report, para. 111)
- 2026-01-11In forceC.N.30.2026.TREATIES-XI.B.16.79UN depositary notification
Q3Who is affected
Vehicle manufacturer
- Check whether the energy transmission, or a part of it, shares the control transmission's energy source or electrical supply.
- If you use the alternative of paragraph 5.3.3.6., fit an energy management system as per paragraph 5.3.3.6.7.
- Give the information listed in paragraph 5.3.3.6.7.3. as part of the documentation required by Annex 6.
- If the safety concept prevents the 25 “figure of eight” manoeuvres, agree the check procedure with the Technical Service.
- Check which failures need the red warning signal under the new condition of paragraph 5.4.2.1.1.
- Check that a new engine start performed automatically does not count as an initiation of the powertrain (para. 5.6.4.2.1.).
Component supplier
- If you supply an energy management system, give the vehicle manufacturer the information listed in paragraph 5.3.3.6.7.3.
- If you supply an energy management system, check that it accurately identifies the condition for the paragraph 5.4.2.1.5. warnings.
Technical service / Approval authority
- Check the accuracy of the energy management system under reasonably foreseeable operating conditions, by document review and tests.
- Assess how each variable used by the energy management system influences the performance and state of the storage device(s).
- If the safety concept prevents the 25 “figure of eight” manoeuvres, agree the check procedure with the manufacturer.
- In Annex 8 tests 3.5.7.1.1. and 3.5.7.2.1., begin with a new initiation of the powertrain by the driver.
See every change side by side
RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.
ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.
More UN R79 change reports
- 05 series — Supplement 1
- 05 series — Base text
- 04 series — Supplement 12
- 04 series — Supplement 11
- 04 series — Supplement 10
- 04 series — Supplement 9
- 04 series — Supplement 8
- 04 series — Supplement 7
- 04 series — Supplement 6
- 04 series — Supplement 5
- 04 series — Supplement 4
- 04 series — Supplement 3
- 04 series — Supplement 2
- 04 series — Supplement 1
- 04 series — Base text
- 03 series — Supplement 17
- 03 series — Supplement 16
- 03 series — Supplement 15
- 03 series — Supplement 14
- 03 series — Supplement 12
- 03 series — Supplement 11
- 03 series — Supplement 10
- 03 series — Supplement 9
- 03 series — Supplement 8
- 03 series — Supplement 7
- 03 series — Supplement 6
- 03 series — Supplement 5
- 03 series — Supplement 4
- 03 series — Supplement 3
- 03 series — Supplement 2
- 03 series — Supplement 1