RegVault

UN R83 Supplement 12 (06 series) · UNECE Regulation No. 83 (ECE R83) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements.

UN R83 — Supplement 12 to the 06 series of amendments

Supplement 11 → 12

Adopted at the WP.29 176th sessionEntry into force 2019-05-28
What changed
  • New paragraph 14. gives alternative procedures for periodical regenerating systems, the Type V test, the Type VI test and the OBD test.
  • Annex 14 now sets which operating mode is selected for Condition A and Condition B tests of hybrid electric vehicles.
  • Appendix 6 adds minimum reagent tank capacities, and reagent levels at which the warning system may activate at the choice of the manufacturer.
Why
  • Annex 14 paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.2.1. left a lot of room for interpretation, so the table is replaced with clear mode selection guidance.
  • The alternative procedures of paragraph 14. allow WLTP results to be used, which saves significant testing burden for vehicles approved according to WLTP.
  • Informal document GRPE-77-11, which amends Appendix 6, aimed at clarifying the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) level warning provisions.

Q1What changed102 changes

Mono-fuel and bi-fuel gas vehicle definitions (paras 2.22.1., 2.23. and 2.23.1.)

The "mono-fuel gas vehicle" definition now says "nominal capacity" of the petrol tank, instead of "capacity". The "bi-fuel vehicle" definition now says "designed to run primarily on only one fuel at a time". The simultaneous use of both fuels is now "permitted in limited amount and duration"; before, it was "limited in amount and duration". A "bi-fuel gas vehicle" is now a bi-fuel vehicle where the two fuels are petrol (petrol mode) and either LPG, NG/biomethane, or hydrogen.

"Mono-fuel gas vehicle" means a vehicle that is designed primarily for permanent running on LPG or NG/biomethane or hydrogen, but may also have a petrol system for emergency purposes or starting only, where the nominal capacity of the petrol tank does not exceed 15 litres.
"Bi-fuel vehicle" means a vehicle with two separate fuel storage systems that is designed to run primarily on only one fuel at a time. The ; however the simultaneous use of both fuels is permitted in limited in amount and duration.
1 more change in this group — open in Compare

Alternative procedures (new paragraph 14.)

New paragraph 14. gives alternative procedures for periodical regenerating systems, the Type V test, the Type VI test and the OBD test. For periodical regenerating systems, the manufacturer may use WLTP results from Amendment 4 of UN GTR No. 15 instead of the Annex 13 procedure. For the durability test, the WLTP road load, inertia weight class and Type I test cycle may replace those of this Regulation (paragraph 14.2.). Additional provisions apply in each case.

Alternative procedures
Alternative procedure for periodical regenerating systems
29 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Hybrid electric vehicle test conditions and operating modes (Annex 14, paras 3.1.1. and 3.2.1.1. to 3.2.1.4.2.2.)

Condition A and Condition B tests are now "started" with the given state of charge; before, they were "carried out" with it. Under Condition B in paragraph 3.2.1.2., the test is also carried out with an operating mode keeping the vehicle in charge-sustaining operating condition. In agreement with the type approval authority and justified by the manufacturer, the operation modes in paragraph 3.2.1.3.(a) to (c) are not considered for testing. Examples given are 'charge mode', 'maintenance mode' and 'mountain mode'. New paragraphs 3.2.1.4. to 3.2.1.4.2.2. set which operating mode is selected for Condition A and for Condition B. The table that gave the operating mode switch position, and its notes, are deleted.

Condition A: Test shall be carried out started with a fully charged electrical energy/power storage device.
Condition B: Test shall be carried out started with an electrical energy/power storage device in minimum state of charge (maximum discharge of capacity).
20 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Reagent tank capacity and start of the warning system (Appendix 6, paras 1.1., 1.2., 2.1. and 3.5.)

If the reagent tank can be easily replenished, a full tank must not need replenishing over an average driving range of 5 full fuel tanks. If it is not easy to replenish, the minimum tank capacity is at least equivalent to an average driving distance of 15 full fuel tanks. These capacity restrictions do not apply if the manufacturer chooses to start the warning system at least 2,400 km before the reagent tank becomes empty. At the choice of the manufacturer, the warning system may activate at the latest at level (a) or (b) of paragraph 3.5., whichever occurs earlier. Level (a) is a level expected to be sufficient for driving 150% of an average driving range with a complete tank of fuel. Level (b) is 10% of the capacity of the reagent tank.

This annex Annex sets out the requirements for vehicles that rely on the use of a reagent for the after-treatment system in order to reduce emissions. Every reference in this Annex to 'reagent tank' shall be understood as also applying to other containers in which a reagent is stored.
The capacity of the reagent tank shall be such that a full reagent tank does not need to be replenished over an average driving range of 5 full fuel tanks providing the reagent tank can be easily replenished (e.g. without the use of tools and without removing vehicle interior trim. The opening of an interior flap, in order to gain access for the purpose of reagent replenishment, shall not be understood as the removal of interior trim). If the reagent tank is not considered to be easy to replenish as described above, the minimum reagent tank capacity shall be at least equivalent to an average driving distance of 15 full fuel tanks. However, in the case of the option in paragraph 3.5. of this appendix, where the manufacturer chooses to start the warning system at a distance which may not be less than 2,400 km before the reagent tank becomes empty, the above restrictions on a minimum reagent tank capacity shall not apply.
6 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Activation and deactivation of the inducement system (Appendix 6, paras 8.2., 8.3.1., 8.3.4., 8.4. and 8.6.)

The inducement system must now activate at the latest at a reagent level that depends on how the warning system was activated (paragraph 8.2.). Paragraphs 8.3.1.1. to 8.3.1.4. and 8.3.4.1. to 8.3.4.4. now set when engine restarts are prevented, in the "no engine restart after countdown" and "performance restriction" approaches. In addition, engine restarts are prevented immediately after the reagent tank becomes empty, if this occurs earlier. After engine restarts are prevented, deactivation needs the irregularities of paragraphs 4., 5. or 6. rectified, or added reagent meeting a criterion of paragraph 8.4. Paragraph 8.6. is deleted, and paragraphs 8.7. and 8.8. become 8.6. and 8.7.

The inducement system shall activate at the latest when the level of reagent in the tank reaches a level equivalent to the average driving range of the vehicle with a complete tank of fuel. The system shall also activate when the failures in paragraphs 4., 5. or 6. have occurred, depending on the NOx monitoring approach. The detection of an empty reagent tank and the failures mentioned in paragraphs 4., 5. or 6. shall result in the failure information storage requirements of paragraph 7. coming into effect.:
In the case that the warning system was activated at least 2,400 km before the reagent tank was expected to become empty, a level expected to be sufficient for driving the average driving range of the vehicle with a complete tank of fuel.
22 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Warning system, dosing interruption, instructions and frozen reagent (Appendix 6, paras 3.1., 3.4., 5.5., 6.2., 9.3., 9.4. and 10.)

The warning system now informs the driver when an abnormality is detected in the reagent dosing (paragraph 3.1.). Paragraph 5.5. now says "initiated by the engine system" where it said "demanded by the engine ECU". Paragraphs 9.3. and 9.4. now use "replenish" wording instead of "refill" wording. For frozen reagent, paragraph 10. now says "liquefied and ready for correct operation" instead of "available for use".

The vehicle shall include a warning system consisting of visual alarms that informs the driver when an abnormality is detected in the reagent dosing e.g. when emissions are too high, the reagent level is low, that the tank soon needs to be refilledreagent dosing is interrupted, or the reagent is not of a quality specified by the manufacturer. The warning system may also include an audible component to alert the driver.
The warning system does not initially need to be continuously activated, however the warning shall escalate so that it becomes continuous as the level of the reagent approaches the point where the driver inducement system in paragraph 8. comes into effect. An explicit warning shall be displayed (e.g. "fill up urea"', "fill up AdBlue", or "fill up reagent"). The continuous warning system may be temporarily interrupted by other warning signals providing that they are important safety related messages.
6 more changes in this group — open in Compare

Particulate emissions, temperature sensor and test annex wording (para. 5.3.1.2.4., Annex 4A, Appendix 2, Annex 7 and Annex 8)

Particulate pollutant emissions are now also recorded from vehicles with direct injection petrol engines, not only compression-ignition engines (paragraph 5.3.1.2.4.). The temperature sensor before the volume measuring device now needs a response time of 1.0 second or less, instead of 0.1 s. Both values apply at 62 per cent of a given temperature variation; the value may now be measured in water or silicone oil. The accuracy and precision are now given as ± 1 °C instead of ± 1 K. Annex 7, paragraph 7.4.4.3. now says "purge test procedure" instead of "purge tat procedure". Annex 8, paragraph 3.2.1. now refers to "Table A4a/1 and Figure A4a/1" instead of "Table 1 and Figure 1".

During the test, the exhaust gases are diluted and a proportional sample collected in one or more bags. The exhaust gases of the vehicle tested are diluted, sampled and analysed, following the procedure described below, and the total volume of the diluted exhaust is measured. Not only are the carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxide emissions recorded, but also the particulate pollutant emissions from vehicles equipped with compression-ignition engines are recordedand direct injection petrol engines.
The method of measuring total dilute exhaust volume incorporated in the constant volume sampler shall be such that measurement is accurate to ±2 per cent % under all operating conditions. If the device cannot compensate for variations in the temperature of the mixture of exhaust gases and dilution air at the measuring point, a heat exchanger shall be used to maintain the temperature to within ±6 K 6K of the specified operating temperature.
4 more changes in this group — open in Compare
See every change side by side in Compare

Q2Why it changed

Proposed by
Expert from the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers; expert from the European Commission
Working party
GRPE, 77th session (June 2018)

Reasons

  • Annex 14 paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.2.1. left a lot of room for interpretation, which could lead to physically unreasonable interpretations. Condition B should reflect a charging balance neutral SOC balance, that is, only the energy used for vehicle propulsion. Text from WLTP was used as the basis, and the table under paragraph 3.2.1. is replaced with clear mode selection guidance.

    Sources (5)
    “Annex 14, paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.2.1. define condition A and condition B under which an OVC-HEV shall be tested according to this regulation.”
    “nevertheless leave a lot of room for interpretation which could lead to physically unreasonable interpretations of the legislation.”
    “Condition B shall reflect a charging balance neutral SOC balance which means that it should reflect only the energy used for vehicle propulsion.”
    “Legislative text from WLTP has been used as basis and reference for the amendment.”
    “Amendment removes the table under paragraph 3.2.1. and replaces it with a clear mode selection guidance.”
  • New paragraph 14. was proposed to allow the use of WLTP-based Ki and Deterioration Factor (DF) factors, and of On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) demos. The influence of different test cycles on the factors is limited, and WLTP provides the more recent and robust testing. For a vehicle approved according to WLTP, using those results also for UN Regulations No. 83 and No. 101 approvals saves significant testing burden.

    Sources (3)
    “to adapt the provisions in UN Regulation No. 83 to allow the usage of WLTP-based Ki and Deterioration Factor (DF) factors as well as On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) demos.”
    “The influence of different test cycles on the factors is limited, additionally the WLTP provides the more recent and robust testing.”
    “In the case a manufacturer approves a vehicle according to WLTP, it saves significant testing burden, if that results can also be used for UN Regulations No. 83 and No. 101 approvals.”
  • The previous response time of 0.1 seconds at 62 per cent, measured in silicone oil, is beyond the capability of most readily available temperature sensors. The sensors that meet it, namely exposed junction thermocouples, have several disadvantages, such as challenges with meeting calibration accuracy and greater susceptibility to electromagnetic interference.

    Sources (2)
    “The current response time of 0.1 seconds at 62% measured in silicone oil is beyond the capability of most readily available temperature sensors.”
    “The sensors that can meet this response time – namely exposed junction thermocouples – introduce several disadvantages of their own such as greater challenges with meeting calibration accuracy, greater susceptibility to electromagnetic interference”
  • Informal document GRPE-77-11 aimed at clarifying the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) level warning provisions.

    Source
    “The expert from EC presented informal document GRPE-77-11, superseding documents ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/76 (Annex IV), ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/48/Add.1 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/49/Add.1, aimed at clarifying Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) level warning provisions.”
  • Proposer's reason (informal document GRPE-77-11)

    With the focus on smaller AdBlue® tanks, the 2,400 km warning distance would equal a high percentage of tank volume across the diesel car fleet. Customers would need to refill the AdBlue® tank at nearly every other refuelling stop. For heavy-duty vehicles, the warning has to be activated at least at a reagent level of 10 per cent of total reagent tank volume. The heavy-duty warning and inducement requirements provide a reasonable starting point, which should be taken over as an option for the manufacturer. The provisions should permit the manufacturer, in agreement with the Type Approval Authority, to determine the starting point for warning and inducement system activation. The starting point should be within reasonable limits for the vehicle type, to avoid unsatisfied customers facing frequent and untimely warning messages.

    Submitted by Expert from the European Commission. Working party adoption: ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/77, para. 11.

    Sources (6)
    “With the necessary focus on smaller AdBlue® tanks, the current warning scenario distance of 2,400 km would equal a high percentage of the total reagent tank volume across the diesel car fleet”
    GRPE-77-11II. Justification, para. 5
    “would result in customers needing to refill the AdBlue® tank at nearly every other refuelling stop.”
    GRPE-77-11II. Justification, para. 5
    “For heavy-duty vehicles, the warning has to be activated at least at a reagent level of 10 per cent of total reagent tank volume.”
    GRPE-77-11II. Justification, para. 7
    “The warning and inducement requirements for heavy-duty vehicles provides a reasonable starting point, which should be taken over into the Euro 6 legislation as an option for the manufacturer.”
    GRPE-77-11II. Justification, para. 9
    “The provisions should permit the manufacturer in agreement with the Type Approval Authority to determine the starting point for warning and inducement system activation within reasonable limits for the vehicle type”
    GRPE-77-11II. Justification, para. 9
    “to avoid unsatisfied customers facing frequent and untimely warning messages.”
    GRPE-77-11II. Justification, para. 9

Document trail

  1. 2018-03ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2018/13Proposal by the expert from OICA for paragraph 2.22.1.
  2. 2018-03ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2018/14Proposal by the expert from OICA on the selection of driving modes for testing OVC-HEVs
  3. 2018-03ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2018/15Proposal by the expert from OICA to allow WLTP-based Ki and DF factors and OBD demos
  4. 2018-03ProposalECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2018/18Proposal by the expert from OICA on the Constant Volume Sampling system temperature sensor response time
  5. —Amended in sessionGRPE-77-02Amendments by the expert from the Netherlands to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2018/14
  6. —Amended in sessionGRPE-77-31Amendments by the expert from OICA to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2018/18
  7. —ProposalGRPE-77-11Proposal by the expert from the European Commission for Appendix 6
  8. —Working party adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/77Session report, paras 7 to 12: GRPE adopted the proposals and asked the secretariat to submit them to WP.29 and AC.1
  9. 2018-08Sent to WP.29ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/147Text that GRPE sent to WP.29 and AC.1
  10. 2018-11WP.29 adoptsECE/TRANS/WP.29/1142Adopted at the 176th session (session report, para. 172)
  11. 2019-05-28In forceC.N.246.2019.TREATIES-XI.B.16.83UN depositary notification

Q3Who is affected

Vehicle manufacturer

  • Check reagent tank capacity against paragraph 1.1., unless the warning starts at least 2,400 km before the tank becomes empty.
  • Set inducement activation to the paragraph 8.2. level that matches how the warning system was activated.
  • Update engine restart prevention to the cases in paragraphs 8.3.1.1. to 8.3.1.4. and 8.3.4.1. to 8.3.4.4.
  • Select the Condition A and Condition B operating mode by the rules of paragraphs 3.2.1.4.1. and 3.2.1.4.2.
  • Justify, and agree with the type approval authority, any operation modes not considered for testing under paragraph 3.2.1.3.

Component supplier

  • No direct action for this role.

Technical service / Approval authority

  • From manufacturer information, make sure Table 1 emission limits are not exceeded in all hybrid modes, except 'maintenance mode'.
  • Be ready for applications that use the alternative procedures of paragraph 14.

See every change side by side

RegVault customers compare every version of UN regulations, read the consolidated text and download the PDF.

ⓘ This report gives advice only. It is not legal or type-approval advice.

More UN R83 change reports

All UN R83 change reports